What to say?
emmm, I don’t know.
I don’t know where to start and I don’t know where to end.
Just talk about it.
Well, regarding the knowledge blockade, someone in the comment area said: Cannons, machine guns, and weapons could be produced in the late Qing Dynasty, and the same could be done in the Republic of China. The arsenals of the Republic of China, such as Jinling, Northeast, Northwest, Taiyuan, etc., aren't these industrial manufacturing? Are there no drawings?
Yes, there is.
But here comes the question, do you know what a standard is?
You expect the industry of the Republic of China, which is at the bottom of industry, to figure out a set of drawing standards on its own, right?
From the late Qing Dynasty to the early Republic of China, and before the founding of the People's Republic of China, which industry field was not controlled by others?
In the Jiangnan Manufacturing Bureau in the late Qing Dynasty, Zeng Guofan commissioned Rong Hong to purchase more than 100 types of machines from Pu Denan Company in New York, USA, and all of them were merged into the Jiangnan Manufacturing Bureau.
Fuzhou Shipping Bureau in the late Qing Dynasty, in 1865, Zuo Zongtang asked Ming Deke to go to Europe to order the machines and materials needed to build a shipyard.
There are all foreign influences here.
Let’s take another example of the aircraft manufacturing industry of the Republic of China. The Zhonghang Factory was able to manufacture aircraft. The Republic of China had 51% of the shares and the United States had 49% of the shares. The co-authored technology came from China, right?
Also, aerodynamics was a brand new subject in the 1930s, as was aircraft design. Before the aircraft carriers in World War II had not demonstrated their potential on a large scale, and before the battleships were swept away from the trash can of history, the swept-wing aircraft Before it appeared, the aviation industry was not taken seriously, which is why the aviation industry in the early Republic of China was able to develop and establish the Zhonghang Factory.
Did the knowledge blockade mentioned in the article mention "apart from aerodynamics and aircraft design"?
Back to topic.
Who doesn’t know how to draw?
Not to mention far away, in the recent Republic of China, Zhang Daqian and Zhang Lao had superb painting skills.
But without systematic study of cartographic standards, who knows?
The industry of the Republic of China did not have a common technical language of its own. Others hid the drawings, but they themselves hid the technology. If the drawings are given to you, you can copy them.
Note, it is a copy.
However, you only know what it is, but you don’t know why. Without your own drawing standards, you will never be able to use the reverse reasoning on this drawing to come up with something that is truly your own.
The workers only saw the technology on the drawings. As students, Fang Yu and Zhou Yuan saw the drawing standards.
Others say that so many people go to Japan to study, but those universities do not prevent Chinese students from learning knowledge.
Yes, there is really no obstruction. I usually don’t stop you from holding sports meetings, but when the limelight is tight, I let you come here to take refuge. I treat you well and learn to go back to make troubles. After the limelight is over, you will continue to make troubles.
I do not deny the positive significance of studying in Japan. After all, many people have been there. Now I am able to type on the keyboard here thanks to many people here. I am very grateful and respectful. However, we should not ignore one thing. The other side.
What is the essence of knowledge blockade?
Block roads.
Drawing standards are blocked in the mechanical field, and technical equipment is blocked in the chemical field.
The Republic of China had airplanes, but I won’t mention their performance. But the Republic of China had cannons and a steel industry, so what?
Comparable to me?
My annual steel output is several hundred W, and my annual steel output is thousands of W. I have a complete industrial foundation that can be independently upgraded and developed. What about you?
In front of me, you are the meat on the chopping board.
The term knowledge blockade originated in modern times. An article called Empirical Research on Knowledge Blockade, Capability Isolation, Strategic Capture and Low-end Lock-in Effect.
This is one of the sources of inspiration.
The content explained in it is very real. The impact of knowledge blockade, capability isolation and strategic capture on the formation of low-end lock-in effect. The results show:
Knowledge blockade leads to a lack of technological upgrade capabilities, thus forming a low-end lock-in effect;
Market isolation leads to a lack of market upgrade capabilities, thus creating a low-end lock-in effect;
Strategic capture leads to a lack of willingness to upgrade, which in turn creates a low-end lock-in effect.
What's the meaning?
Lock up your country.
I still apply the Cold War mentality of the 1930s, mixed with private goods, and don’t write my own stuff. I am here to write a history book as a co-author, right?
Tell some people that the West’s desire to destroy itself has never ceased, and Japan’s desire to devour China still exists today.
Without the October Revolution in the north, I might still be working as 007 in the factory, working day and night for a month, and only making ends meet for a year.
As for the Hou Debang that some say, it just so happens, emmm, here is a spoiler, the setting is that the knowledge blockade originated in the Sino-Japanese War, was stricter than the Hou Debang, climaxed in 1933, eased with Soviet aid, and ended at the end of World War II.
Then, a technology that was familiar to many people but was extremely new to the time came to block the road.
Looking at it from the 1950s, it used to be called a quick knife to kill people, but now it is called a soft knife to cut flesh.
Looking back from the 1930s, in the past it was called soft knives to cut flesh, but now it is called quick knives to kill people.
Looking at it from my age, I can only sigh: "History..."
Finally, I would like to mention that some people say that the first set of cartographic standards was found in "The Mandarin of the Journey to the West". Let me tell you, the Manchu of the Journey to the West was published in October 1937. The date of the article is now - Tuesday, February 23, 1937, at 1:20 pm. fifteen.
Huh, after I finished talking, it turned out that I really shouldn’t have written a single chapter. I wrote more than a thousand at once, and if I wrote more, it would be another chapter.
See this, ask for a vote, and give me a recommendation vote.
