Since a certain author is shameless, let's talk about it properly.
The title of the other party's book is "I Can Extract Side Effects", his pen name is Riding a Pig to Dig a Hole, and his starting point is "frola12".
Here's the thing.
Our book was released on November 26 last year, and the reality line is about biotechnology.
That book was released on November 29 last year, also in biotechnology.
In addition, there are not many works on Qidian Biotechnology, so during the new book period, some readers will comment on the two books while scanning the books. As a result, my reputation has been overwhelming.
After being put on the shelf, this book currently has 8,000+ orders, and that one only has about 3,000 - and based on the information learned, the authenticity of the other party's data is doubtful.
It's just that the data involves people who are inconvenient to be involved, so I won't reveal your follow-up subscription data. I dare to be responsible if I dare to post this.
All in all.
The subject matter was similar, but my score was better than it, so the author's heart exploded.
It first searched for dirty information for a long time, and finally found an angle - some of my replies on the QQ reader when I was writing the Conquest Manual.
I used swear words in those few replies, so they used this as a starting point to pretend that my book was worthless.
The routine is usually to start by saying that I am trolling people, and then change the topic and say that my book is a complete mess, there is no interesting story at all, and I am a newbie...
to be honest.
I can understand some of the other words, but I didn't expect this book to be regarded as a wisdom retreat.
If I hadn't been able to see the data in the background, I would have suspected that I was writing a book about 80% uniformity...
Then, the readers who spoke for me were labeled as my trump account. Can we check the IP address first before assigning the blame?
Thousands of kilometers apart...
And what about those trolling comments?
First of all, I did troll people.
Because the other party insulted me first, cursing my family, such as car accidents, terminal illnesses, and greetings with various anti-stress statements. For example, I still remember this sentence: "Write a book to make money for you to buy a tomb?"
So I sprayed it back, it was that simple, and I still don’t regret it.
As for the ban on my book, except for a few troublemakers, there are not many others banned, because my threshold for speaking is 500 fans, and those who can speak are basically book friends.
Readers may have different opinions on author banning, and they can understand it no matter how they evaluate it outside, because the amount of information received by the two roles of "author" and "reader" and the perspective of looking at the problem are different.
But as an author, if you pretend that readers are using forbidden things to set the pace for black people, then you are either stupid or bad - if any colleagues see what I say, they should understand what I mean.
Let’s talk about the book next.
Because this guy was crushed by me in the new book issue, he hacked me from February to now. I didn’t know about it until a while ago.
But I didn't pay much attention to it at the time, but the clinker got more and more serious, and would spray it on me every two days.
Every time I spray, I always like to pull out Chenxing's "Xueba" and praise it. I say I deserve to be inferior to others. Readers' eyes are sharp...
are you crazy......
Not to mention that my book is not a regular scholar's book at all. It is about the history of science and technology, stories about the eras of Newton, Su Song, and Maxwell.
Even if you are a regular student of Bawen, your grades are indeed better than mine, and your content is better than mine. Is there anything wrong with admitting this?
For example, the recent book "Xueba Wen Who Doesn't Eat Little Pumpkins" was released on the shelves. When the new book was released, I said in many writers' groups that it was well written. Many of my friends can testify to this - but in fact, we are still talking to each other now. Don't know anyone.
As an author, it is human nature to praise and learn from a good work. There is nothing to be ashamed of in admitting the gap, right?
It's a pity that some people just can't do it, they are still small-minded, and they just try to criticize others when their grades are not as good as others.
Not to mention that my book is indeed not as good as "Xueba", but there are not many books with a higher starting point than "Xueba"...
Also take a look at this author’s exact words and call it your own:
[The starting point is that I don’t have a few thousand yuan to subscribe to black science and technology articles, so this is a high-quality book. The writing is delicate enough, and the rhythm is okay]
OK, let's see how delicate it is.
Up to now.
My follow-up subscription is several times that of it (I don’t know the real data, if the data is real, I am more than ten times that of it), my average subscription is three times that of it, my monthly subscription is 15 times that of it, and my daily sales are about five times that of it. six times.
Also look at the 'rhythm' it talks about:
My book has 2 million words so far, and the main character is worth 400,000 yuan. He has developed the fifth-generation imidacloprid and anti-bad breath toothpaste, and published a SCI1 area paper. The company’s maximum fund of 10 million is a loan.
That book has 1.3 million words, the protagonist is worth tens of billions, he cured liver cancer in the beginning, and conquered AIDS in the latest chapter, and CNS publishes it at will.
The full text of my co-authored work on step-by-step scientific research is mentally retarded and exaggerated. Your book, in which the main character starts off by curing a terminal illness and building a rocket, is completely logical and realistic?
That’s not how double standards work, right?
In addition, when reading its posts, I accidentally discovered its so-called "creative experience"
[Go to a website next door to scan the rankings, then find Huoshu to pick up the outline, change some content starting points, and you will have a high-quality product]
As an author who is at most a waist, I am not qualified to comment on the current trend, because it is determined by the market.
But is it fair to readers to share “experience” in such an open manner?
Is it fair to the original author who was outlined by you?
Originally, I wasn't going to publish this single chapter today.
After I inquired about the other editor, I asked another author who was the same editor to contact that editor.
What I mean is to tell it that I know who you are, and stop pretending to be a passerby in the forum. I am too lazy to talk about this kind of thing, so that's about it.
Others are tearing each other apart, but their results are about the same.
As a result, this guy told me that I was being cautious.
You, the co-author, hacked me on the forum for eight months. After I found out about the situation, I went to the trustee and told your editor, so that means I'm being petty?
It really distorts the facts...
I think this world should still have some sense and logic.
all in all.
Since reminding you privately is being petty, I'll just send a single chapter to explain the situation clearly, and there's nothing I can do about it if I'm shameless.
Also, I read this book and found several very interesting places. I will list them for everyone to see.
1.
I wrote about the research and development of imidacloprid in this book in December. The chapter on the shelf clearly stated that it is a method of killing insects using sodium ion channel neurotoxin, and the opponent is Bayer. The above steps are completely original to me.
That book also launched an insecticide in May, which is also a sodium ion channel-neurotoxin. It also competes with Bayer, but the target is not cockroaches but locusts.
But that writer will give you some popular science knowledge.
Locusts have a chain-like nervous system. The LGMD neurons of social locusts will convert phenylacetonitrile into hydrocyanic acid, so locusts will not be killed by sodium ion channel neurotoxins. Currently, the only chemical killers of locusts are organochlordieldrin. - It's not a question of whether neurotoxins have been developed or not. They are not receptors for neurotoxins at all.
Sodium channel-neurotoxins are only effective against cockroaches and mosquitoes.
Even if I write it down, you won’t be able to get it.
2.
My book ended in Su Song's copy at the end of March. I discovered Yi'an bacteria and the survival software was quite extreme. After the discovery, the protagonist carried out gene expansion and gene editing. He received a microbial battery award more than ten days ago and established a microbiological laboratory.
In the chapter of that book on June 17, a certain microorganism was also discovered under extreme conditions. After the discovery, the protagonist carried out gene editing, and the latest chapter established a microbiology laboratory.
3.
The Yi'an bacterium in my book can kill Neisseria and anaerobic streptococci, and the book in it has changed to kill Helicobacter pylori, which are oral intestinal bacteria.
The above is just what I found after briefly scanning the catalog.
truth.
In the face of the huge size of the current Internet, I think it is very normal for the plot coincidences to happen once or twice.
Especially the third point, taking it out alone can be explained as accidental, including when I wrote this sentence. Note, it is taken out alone.
It is indeed biased to rely solely on a certain plot to characterize a certain behavior.
But with so many 'coincidences' that are close to each other in detail, coupled with the author's hostility towards me, the chance of chance is a matter of opinion.
After all, this is not a plot that can be seen everywhere such as photolithography machines and VR. Biotechnology itself is less detailed and even the principles are similar... let’s take a look at the snow-capped mountains in the distance, family.
0K, the cheating ends here, and I will never mention the other party again in the future. That kind of garbage is not worthy.
And everyone, don’t go to its comment area to complain. Firstly, we are qualified, and secondly, its comment area has opened up the threshold. It costs money to complain about it (this will be important later)
Oh, right.
One final addition.
According to the author, this book of mine is a copy of Baidu Encyclopedia.
Put it this way.
My book has 2 million words so far, and you can find 2% of the content from Baidu. All royalties from my book will be transferred directly to you.
The most common place in our book that appears on Baidu Encyclopedia is probably the character deduction at the end of each mission, the year of birth and death of the initial line characters, and the Baidu achievements that I actually copied...
It’s not just that some hard-core or obscure knowledge can only be found through Baidu searches. There are schools in the world called universities that will teach you professional knowledge.
Once you have that knowledge, it will be easy for you to remember it without searching.
....
Everything else has been written here, so let’s summarize the papers currently being referenced:
doi: 10.27307/.gsjtu.2018.000319
/10.1038/s41586-021-04001-40
D01:10.1126/x1342.
DOl:10.1126/science. 1201959.
doi: 10.16346/.37-1101/c.2002 06.022
doi: 10.13850/.chinum.2005.04.010
doi10.15932/j.0253-9713.2017.01.030.
doi10.16783/.nwnus. 2009.05.007
/10.1038%2Fnature0957
Can't help/10.1099/js.0.02503-0
doi10.13881/.hljxmsy.2021.02.0100/
doi10.28502/.nkjrb.2014.007254
doi10.15967/.cn14- 1312/g4.2008.06.006
doi: CNK:SUN:WGJY.0.2007-02-012
/10.1038/nature13156
/10.4007/annals.2015.181.2.4
DO: 10.1126/science.1136303
/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.033818
/10.1088/1367- 2630/1 5/3/033018
/10.1119/1.161041
DOI: 10.1126/science. 1136303
org/10. 1038/nature24051
/10.3847/2041-8213/aba493
doi: 10.1126/bc0105
/10.1103/PhysRevC.13.1236
I mistakenly posted this chapter as a VIP before. Although it was deleted after only ten minutes, more than 600 readers still paid. So anyone who mistakenly ordered it can privately message me in the fan group for a refund.
This chapter is welcome to spread.
