The difference between Lingxiao Palace and Lingxiao Palace is not caused by a writing mistake by the author. Lingxiao Palace is the sect of Chao Yuzhen. After Chao Yuzhen fell, Lingxiao Palace was on the verge of disbandment. At that time, Song Yanci, a half-step true ancestor, appeared. He took over the remnants of Lingxiao Palace, established his own sect, and founded "Lingxiao Palace" on the original site.
Song Yanci regarded himself as an orthodox direct descendant and had the ambition to return Lingxiao Palace to Lingxiao Palace. After all, he had the ambition to become the Emperor of Heaven, otherwise he would not have colluded with that "enemy" and harmed his sister Song Xiaoyan, who had always been very good to him.
Therefore, there is only one character difference between Lingxiao Palace and Lingxiao Palace, and they have the same pronunciation but different characters.
. . . .
A little digression.
I saw a joke some time ago: If you had the power to absolutely crush the whole world in reality, what would you do?
The most common answers are:
On the first day, with great power comes great responsibility. I want to be a superman.
The next day, I want to be a citizen of the motherland.
On the third day, I don’t eat beef.
Although this is just a joke, it at least proves that many people think this way. Even if everyone thought of this statement as a joke, they still thought about it after all. As long as it is possible in the future and the base of people who think about it is getting bigger, something like this will always come out. This is called "The forest is getting bigger. There are all kinds of birds."
If you say that is imagination, it cannot happen. Today’s airplanes, space travel, and landing on the moon were all equally impossible for the ancients. The difference was just imagination?
So this joke is just a joke, revealing an extremely serious issue - the ugliness of human nature: isn't the destructive desire to pursue absolute freedom ugly? And each of you is a participant in the experiment. As long as you have this idea, for the experiment itself, that is enough.
This is just like the good people in your eyes. It’s not that they won’t do bad things or they don’t have bad thoughts. They just don’t have the ability and conditions to do evil. When you have the power that no one can restrain you, you have the conditions to do evil. At that time, as long as the temptation of benefits exceeds your moral threshold, you will do evil.
You said I would never be tempted by benefits.
Then set the conditions to start:
If you do evil, what if I give you more money than you can spend in your lifetime? You refuse. very good.
If you do evil, will your arrested relatives be released? If you refuse, that’s fine. I applaud Mr. Ren’s generosity.
but,
If you do evil, what if you can be resurrected before you meet your loved ones for the last time?
If you do evil, will there be no famine, floods, disease, or harm in this world?
What if you do evil and the world will be peaceful and free of war?
Do you know?
You think it is unreasonable to do evil for a reasonable, legitimate, just, and great purpose! That cannot exist!
So, is it?
Crimes in this world all have logical reasoning. If crimes had no logic at all and were all committed by mental illness, then there would be no detectives in the world, let alone solutions to the crimes. But being logical does not mean that the purpose is good or bad. Some people have selfish purposes, but many also have good intentions. For example, a mother steals food from a convenience store in order to feed her children who have no food to eat.
First of all, it must be clear that a crime is a crime. Good things depend on the heart, and bad things depend on the behavior. If bad things depend on the heart, wouldn't it be a mess? You can "look at your heart" to reduce the punishment appropriately, but if you are completely innocent, it is too arrogant, and society will inevitably be in chaos.
The villain always says, "There is no one in this world who cannot be bribed. If there is, then it must be that what you have given is not enough, or what you have given is wrong." That's because everyone has weaknesses.
What is weakness? Weakness refers to the point that you will compromise and cannot resist. Otherwise, the point that you can resist is not enough to be called a weakness?
Therefore, the villains who can say such things are villains who see through the human side of people's hearts. At least they still have some IQ, at least in a certain aspect.
You want to say, Ye Yu, what are you doing in the water when you have nothing to do?
Is it water? Why do you always hope that Ye Feng, who has the highest ceiling in this book, will destroy anyone who is unhappy, push him to be invincible, and pretend to be the biggest in the world? Aren't you like this the content of my "water word count"? You are just imagining absolutely free destructive desires. Because absolute freedom must have absolute power. And Ye Feng has this power.
I have said before that whether it is in real society, nature, or the world of fantasy novels about immortality, there is a corresponding "ecological niche".
Take the world of cultivating immortals as an example.
The evolutionary nature of the law of the jungle and the survival of the fittest is the food chain. It is a chain. If you have the highest level of cultivation and can ignore everything and destroy sects all over the world by yourself, this only means that you are at the top of the food chain. But this is a chain, my friend, you are the only one. That is called a lock, that is not called a chain.
This is the most basic fantasy worldview of cultivating immortals, not about strength being respected. If you travel through time and practice to the top with a golden finger, you can do whatever you want, even if you defy logic. Writing novels also requires logic and self-consistency.
If you really traveled to that world, really reached the peak of your training, and really did whatever you wanted, then think about it, would people all over the world come together to suppress you and exclude you?
So what if you are strong in cultivation? You have been beaten into a demon. Can you guard against all kinds of dirty tricks? You’ve read Jin Yong’s novels for a long time. Don’t you know the style of those well-known and upright people?
You are the protagonist and you don’t have to die, but what if you are not? Don’t you think that the protagonists in those cool novels seem to have a God’s perspective, knowing that they have the aura of the protagonist, and that they will not die no matter how they try to commit suicide, so they resort to all kinds of tricks that go against common sense, IQ, and logic to commit suicide? Feel sick?
Take a step back and say, if you put all your efforts in the world to create someone stronger than you, can you beat him?
Well, your cultivation is invincible, you destroy humanity, you kill everyone to death, you monopolize a world by yourself, and continue to cultivate immortality.
To practice alone in an empty world for millions of years? Even to drink a bowl of water, you have to go to the river to fetch water and boil it yourself? If you want to experience the mortal world, you can only create an environment and experience the feeling of VR?
What do you think is the false world of mortals? What realistic breakthroughs can you have? What can you accomplish?
For you, destroying others is equivalent to destroying yourself. In fact, human beings' desire to destroy others and external objects essentially stems from the tendency of self-destruction.
Well, even if your golden finger helps you to cultivate, you ascend to the immortal world, and you slaughter all the immortal world, and you ascend to the divine realm, and you slaughter all the divine realm. Okay, you will always come to a world where you can't kill everyone in the world. What will you do if you are liquidated at that time? After all, if I want to kill you, I just need to find an excuse, not to mention that you are full of excuses.
