As for where to find good men, Linglong was the first to speak. The place she suggested was a big supermarket because a man who loves life would be good. Let’s just say it barely fits the topic.
The place Qing Ni suggested was a bookstore. A man who likes to read is not particularly bad.
Although we often say, "For every person who is righteous, he will slaughter a dog, but for every person who is unfaithful, he will be a scholar." But in fact, that is the "survivor bias theory." In ancient times, all those who could be officials were scholars, so the scum among the scholars were often paid special attention to, but no one cared about the scum and scum among the traffickers and lackeys. You may think that there is a "social cow per capita" in the square dance, but the actual situation is that you won't see it at all.
The place Yingying suggested was a large shopping mall. After all, a man who can accompany his girlfriend to a shopping mall will definitely not be any worse.
Um? etc!
How can I find someone else's boyfriend when I'm looking for a good man? When Linglong raised this question and everyone else expressed confusion with doubtful expressions, Yingying smiled and said, "When did Feng say that finding a good man for Miss Lan Lan is to be her husband?"
What is the purpose of Lan Lan's search for a "good man"? This question placed on the surface of the incident is the biggest flaw, but it is also the point that everyone can most easily ignore. It seems that not everyone has ignored this
And Ye Feng also nodded, approving and affirming Yingying's meticulous insight.
Everyone was stunned at this moment, but no one asked Lan Lan why she was looking for a "good man". The main reason is because Ye Feng didn't say it just now, so there is a reason for not saying it, so there is no need to ask specifically. After the battle in Yong'an, everyone knew that Ye Feng was no longer the big grievance who "shouldered everything on his own shoulders". Then the only explanation is that Lan Lan's purpose has nothing to do with Ye Feng and the others.
And this is indeed the case. What is the Ark plan, who is at the helm, and what does it have to do with Ye Feng and the others?
When Ruan Qinghan returned, he naturally told Ye Feng about the Ark plan and the person at the helm, but so what?
The Ark Project is your plan, Lan Lan, but it was my plan, Ye Feng. You, Lan Lan, think to yourself that I, Ye Feng, am barely capable of being the helmsman, so I, Ye Feng, must have a relationship, responsibility, and obligation with your Ark plan?
Are you a redhead who has eaten the fruit of face? Even if it is, will I, Ye Feng, give you face? Not to mention that Ye Feng still doesn’t know what the purpose of your Ark plan is? To put it another way, even if your Ark Plan is to save the world, then if I am powerful, I must be obligated to save the world, and must it have something to do with your Ark Plan to save the world?
What? With great power comes great responsibility? Who the hell came up with such a stupid idea of moral kidnapping?
In fact, Ye Feng does not have any ill intentions towards the saying "With great power comes great responsibility". It's just that people in the world have taken this sentence out of context and distorted it for their own selfish purposes. It is by no means some private property carried by the author Ye Yu. The explanation is as follows,
First of all, it is not uncommon for ancient sayings to be taken out of context and distorted and misunderstood since ancient times.
For example, "If a person is not selfish, he will be punished by heaven and earth." Nowadays, people understand this to mean: If a person is not selfish, heaven and earth will not tolerate him. But in the original meaning of the ancients, "wei" here refers to cultivation and practice, which means that if a person does not hone his cultivation and character, the world will not tolerate him. The meaning of ancient and modern retreats to the north and south
Another example is "A person who is too petty is not a gentleman, and a person who is not cruel is not a husband." The word "non-toxic" in ancient Chinese literature should actually mean "without restraint", which means without restraint. Without restraint, one is not a man, but without cruelty, one is not a man. Isn't it very sad?
In fact, some people can even misinterpret Confucius' principles, such as "repay vengeance with kindness." In the modern context, repaying grievance with kindness is a complimentary term, but you must know that Confucius, who said this sentence, positioned it as a derogatory term. Because there is another sentence in the context of "repaying kindness with kindness", which is "how to repay kindness with kindness". The original context is this. "The Analects of Confucius Xian Wen" records, or said: "How to repay evil with kindness?" Confucius said: "How to repay kindness? Repay evil with straightness, repay kindness with kindness." This passage in the Analects of Confucius says that someone asked Confucius for advice and was harmed by others. Instead of making any fuss, I respond with kindness. Is this the right thing to do? Regarding this statement, Confucius asked, if kindness is needed to repay hatred, then how will the virtue of receiving kindness be repaid? The original intention of Confucius is: those who are good are good, and those who are evil are evil. Treat people and things with a fair and selfless frankness and peace of mind.
A brief summary of what Confucius wanted to express is: Anyone who repays evil with kindness is a fucking fool.
The misinterpretation of "repaying evil with kindness" is the situation of "the greater the ability, the greater the responsibility", which means taking it out of context and ignoring the context.
"With great power comes great responsibility" comes from Ben Parker, Spider-Man's uncle in Marvel's "Spider-Man". Simply looking at this sentence is a sentence full of positive energy, but again, any truth must have restrictions or context.
Don't understand? "Respecting the old and loving the young" is a traditional virtue of the Chinese people. For example, young people should give up their seats to the elderly. But what is the fact? On the bus, the old man saw that the young man refused to give up his seat, so he slapped the young man more than ten times without explanation. Later, the young man gave up his seat, but the young man was a disabled person with only one leg.
Hahaha. . . Ha ha ha ha. . . This is human nature, which bastard came up with the idea that "weak people are all kind". Are old, weak, women and children necessarily kind? Are all farmers honest?
Sometimes, the reality is very disgusting. These so-called "weak people" use their status as "weak people" to do evil things that only "strong people" can do.
The reason is because they are all human beings, and the human heart is inherently selfish and evil. Otherwise, why would the law exist?
Do I need to give a few more such examples?
No matter how positive the principles are, no matter how correct the ancient sayings are, they are "dead" tools and will only be used by "living people" with ulterior motives to satisfy their own selfish desires. Even the law can be exploited by people to enrich their own pockets, so what do you think?
In the same way, "the greater the ability, the greater the responsibility." There are two most direct "failures":
The first one is that the so-called selfish weak use morals to kidnap those who are capable. But let me ask, since ancient times, responsibilities and rights must be bound together. When you ask those who are capable to take responsibility, have you ever thought about giving them corresponding rights? Spider-Man saves people, but don’t the police consider Spider-Man a criminal?
The second is a certain world's most powerful country, which believes in the idea of "with great power comes great responsibility" and calls itself the world's policeman. In order to maintain world peace, it arbitrarily interferes in the internal affairs of other countries. Seeing that the situation was not right, he patted his butt and left, leaving nothing but chicken feathers in other countries, and the people suffered deeply. What a bastard.
