The orc's question ended quickly. The fat man seemed to agree with him. He thought he would leave here and return to the devil world as promised. However, he saw the orc pick up the mace again, and his originally calm aura became a little more murderous.
The fat man's eyes were slightly cold, and he immediately picked up the Tiangang Flame Devouring Ruler and said angrily, "You are going back on your word!"
The orc looked at the fat man with the eyes of a fool and said, "What he said is indeed very good. No, it is not even an exaggeration to say it is too good. But when did I say that what he said is good, I will retreat and admit defeat." "
The fat man was stunned for a moment, but when he recalled that the other party did not say that, he said he would decide based on the situation. Not a word was mentioned about retreating after a good answer.
"You will misunderstand. You can only blame yourself for being too greedy and eager for success, so you just closed your eyes and listened. Didn't the person just say it? You humans know that you are facing a common enemy, but you still divide tens of thousands Groups are fighting among themselves. There are countless reasons to unite as one, but they are always fighting each other. Even you humans who are the same race and have the same purpose are like this, let alone you and me who have different positions and different purposes. So, you say you are Not a greedy fool"
The fat man was speechless after being retorted, and his mood suddenly became depressed.
And Ye Feng reacted immediately at that time, and the other party is an enemy with a completely different stance from yours. No matter how beneficial he is to you at the moment, as long as his stance does not change, the final result will be detrimental to you and hostile to you. will change. Forgetting this, being called stupid by an orc is not unfair at all.
But Ye Feng can't remind Fatty that this is a battle for Fatty. You must know that it is never good words that can teach people truth, but the southern wall. Therefore, setbacks in battle are the fastest way to accumulate combat experience and strengthen your will in battle. If Ye Feng reminded him, it would be equivalent to killing Fatty's growth opportunity.
Ye Feng doesn't blame Fatty, because combat experience can only be accumulated bit by bit through actual combat, and he is not the protagonist of a brainless novel. And this battle is Fatty's first real battle. How can he demand so much from Fatty under such circumstances?
The reason why Ye Feng is angry is: You fat guy usually refuses to listen to me when I ask you to read more books. What you just asked were stupid questions. Can't you ask some quality and in-depth questions? The idiot next to you asked questions at a much higher level than you, and the questions he asked were also the most direct reason for his behavior at the moment.
Ye Feng knew that Fatty had lost his will to fight at this moment.
But you must cheer up. This opportunity is really rare for you. You must seize it, fat man!
The orc looked at the fat man's expression that had obviously lost his will to fight, and knew that this man was not suitable to be a real warrior, so he sighed and said, "Don't you understand? Then I will explain it to you before I kill you."
At this time, the fat man raised his absent eyes and looked at the orc
"Let me give you an example. There is a famous trolley problem among you humans. You should have heard of it, you"
The orc paused and said disappointedly.
"It seems you don't know, so let me start from the beginning. The so-called trolley problem is one of the ten most famous ideological problems in your human history. What it says is: Suppose 5 people are tied to a trolley track, and on its There is a person tied up on the backup track. At this time, an out-of-control trolley is coming quickly, and there happens to be a joystick next to you. You can push the joystick to make the trolley drive onto the backup track, killing the one person and saving 5 Individual. You can also do nothing, kill 5 people and save 1 person. Seeing that the tram is about to enter that area, you must make a decision in a very short time - whether to kill 1 person and save 1 person. Kill 5 people and save 1 person
Is it difficult to understand? Think this doesn't exist? A global epidemic, with limited medical resources around the world, should we first save those people who have a higher survival rate and are more important to your human society? This is not a question of one person or five people, but a question of It's a question you have to make a choice
From a utilitarian point of view, the obvious choice would be to pull the lever. After all, saving five lives is more cost-effective than saving one. But don’t you humans often say that life is equal and cannot be equated or measured by value. But critics of utilitarianism argue that once you pull the lever, you become complicit in unethical behavior. You were partially responsible for the death of a separate person on another track. Others, however, believe that your situation requires you to do something, and that your inaction would be equally unethical. Isn’t not choosing not also a choice? understand? You can't escape
In short, there is no such thing as completely moral behavior, and that’s the crux of the matter
And what’s interesting is that the choices you humans make under different circumstances also change. Under normal circumstances, most people will choose to kill one person and save five people, but what if six people are given identities? For example, that one person is a young person, and those five people are old people. At that time, more people chose to kill five people to save one person. They believed that young people should live a good life. What if that one person is your relative and those five people are strangers? The vast majority of people will choose to kill five people and save one, because no one thinks that those five people are worth sacrificing their own relatives to save.
It's obviously the same question, but we can't get a unified answer.
Do you know what this situation among you humans is called?
It's chaos and disorder
In this world, chaos and disorder can only lead to destruction, not only your own destruction, but also destruction to other races. To put it more seriously, are there not many species on the earth that have become extinct because of you humans? Speaking more broadly, among the thousands of races in the world, you are not the only one who has the right to survive, everyone else has the same right. But what you don't know is. The existence of your human race will lead to the destruction of the entire world, and all races will be buried with you. Isn’t this the naked trolley problem?
But this time it was different. This time there was no third party controlling the lever. The five people who control the lever are tied up. They are the thousands of races in our world, and you humans are that one person. Because don’t you humans always say that the truth is in the hands of the majority? Doesn’t it mean that the minority obeys the majority? Aren’t these all spoken by you humans yourself?
As I said before, I really like you humans, so I want to exterminate you personally to give you pleasure and prevent other races from killing you.
And the person who answered the question before, the almost perfect answer without any mistakes, aren't they proof of the chaos and disorder of you humans? Isn’t it all the fault of you humans?
In this case, tell me, should I kill you humans?
