I received the editor's notice last week and put it on the shelves today.
Before writing the article, probably more than two years ago, I had thought about what I wanted to write. At that time, I had two plot scenes in mind. One was in a ruins, where the protagonist lay there, probably wiping out all the enemies, and then the big sister gave the protagonist chestnuts to eat. The other was the ending of the book.
I thought a lot about sending chestnuts, but I never thought about it well.
I thought less about the ending because it was too difficult. Although the plot can actually be told in one sentence, if it really follows the plot, it still needs to be set by worldview and forces.
My worldview design ability is probably not as good as AI. Designed by powerful sects, it is not as good as AI. The skill level design is not as good as AI. The description of the fighting scenery is not as good as AI. As for the level of political affairs, I have never won an online quarrel. Historical level, I later found an author who wrote historical articles through a friend and asked for some advice. Basically, he might think that if he taught me multiplication and division, I could learn it in half a month, but in fact, what should I learn first? It is at the level of natural numbers. Although I usually read some social science works, I forget them once I have read them. Moreover, if some highly abstract and concise concepts are placed in a white text, it will be complicated and unsightly.
Later, I talked with the editor. The editor thought that I could give Secret Liao Zhai a try and recommended a few books for me to read. One of them was "Red Man", which was very good-looking. I tied it that night, but I felt that this genre was too difficult for me, so I was still happy as a reader. But suddenly I felt that in fact, if placed in the context of the world view of gods, demons and immortals, the plot would not be impossible to reach the end, because in the world of immortals, there are too many things that I can use directly. Damn it, after thinking about it for a while, I thought I might as well give it a try. After all, I really like the ending. Therefore, the world view setting is basically a stitch, and the originality is very low. All the settings that were not used in my old book were taken over and made up.
I really like the plot of the ending, and I really like the story that I have in mind right now.
Then write it out.
Write it down and it becomes a story of existence.
The 1.2 million-word novel "Stand Up" will be completed before the Spring Festival next year.
Why do I think so much about other things, interfering with my Taoist mind?
So, it’s on the shelves.
If you think you can still watch it, let’s spend this journey together.
If you don’t think it looks good, then we’ll see each other again. I don’t think it’s good enough, and it’s not as good as “Bug House”. It’s too cliche and toxic, but I can understand it. Although I won’t change the plot because of the comments, if I have enough time to update it, I will do some reading comprehension questions. But to say that a studio is a good company is to look down on the studio.
And the author himself doesn't like blood theory, fatalism, masters playing chess, horse-fighting style, etc... so there is a high probability that you will not see these plots.
Finally, I would like to ask for advice, how far is it from Yunqiao Township to Xuanshui Mountain? The accepted answer (the first one to say it), the group is looking for millions of dollars in prizes...
