When Wang Hao came back, he saw a group of people crowded in the corridor, some of them holding cell phones and cameras and studying them carefully. He walked over with some confusion and called out "Dean Luan".
"Wang Hao!"
Luan Haiping came over enthusiastically and explained, "These are reporters who want to interview you. I thought, we all have a clear conscience, so they brought us here if they wanted to do an interview? Don't bother us, right?"
"It doesn't matter."
Wang Hao shook his head indifferently, looked around and immediately noticed that the reporters who had just been studying mobile phones and cameras quickly put down their devices and gathered around.
Luan Haiping looked at the tightly blocked corridor and said simply, "Let's go to the office."
A group of people cheered and went to the director's office.
The director's office on the sixth floor is just a small office. Because there are only two desks, it seems a bit spacious. When more than a dozen people squeeze in, the spaciousness becomes crowded.
Wang Hao sat at his desk, facing more than a dozen reporters, making it easier for reporters to take pictures and ask questions.
A middle-aged reporter was the first to ask, "Last night, you published an article saying that there were not seven papers, but ten, which caused a new wave of public opinion. If there are no problems in the papers, why don't you clarify it?"
Wang Hao's mentality has been adjusted. What is true is true and what is false is false. He said with a smile, "I spent a long time yesterday brushing up the meager amount. It was really interesting. Many people just watched it. After reading the article and reading the comments, I was led to question my thesis and the university’s decision.”
"Then I was thinking about a question. Public opinion can be guided. So, a more scientific guidance method can turn public opinion in a new direction."
He continued thinking, "Maybe we should conduct scientific research on this to explain the relationship between events, public opinion trends and guidance."
"Can you write a social science paper on this? However, you need a professional social science scholar to do it." He said and shook his head, seeming to regret that he could not do similar research.
Then he added, "Oh, by the way, I don't want to clarify your question."
"This is referring to a deer as a horse. It is extremely ridiculous. That is an ancient story. If someone points to your horse today and insists on saying that it is a deer, you will stand up and patiently explain to him the difference between horse and deer. The difference?"
The reporters present were stunned by the question. They did not expect to hear such an answer at all.
The other party first stood from the perspective of a bystander and a professional scholar, thinking about whether scientific research can be conducted on the guidance of public opinion, and then gave an example of calling a deer a horse.
really.
If someone points to their horse and says it is a deer, will they still patiently explain the difference between a horse and a deer?
Then he must be yelled at in person, "Are you stupid? You're sick!"
"Uh~~~"
It seems wrong to think this way, are you scolding yourself?
However, most people don’t know whether a professional paper is valuable or whether it is the product of plagiarism, fabrication, or plagiarism.
A female reporter wearing glasses said with sharp eyes, "Can you tell me why you can publish so many papers? As far as I know, most scientific researchers are already excellent if they publish three or four SCI papers every year. .”
"Scientific researcher? Can't talk about it."
Wang Hao shook his head and said, "I don't do any special research. Those papers are just a summary of my teaching insights."
After he finished speaking, he followed the train of thought and explained, "It can be said that it is enlightenment. Let me give you an example and you will understand."
Everyone listened carefully.
"For example, my previous work on Fourier transform to assist in building mathematical models was inspired by the teaching process. When I was teaching the content of Fourier transform and explaining the process of transforming from other functions into sinusoidal expressions, I thought about whether I could continue to transform …”
"Later, when doing analytical transformation, I thought of the discrete Fourier transform. As we all know, the discrete Fourier transform is a very important computer algorithm. If we continue to expand it..."
"A student asked a question after class, saying that he didn't quite understand the image expression during the function transformation process. I explained it to him, and then I thought, what would happen if it was applied to structural diagrams?"
"everybody knows……"
us!
have no idea!
Ever since Wang Hao talked about professional mathematics content, the reporters present could no longer understand.
Luan Haiping and Zhou Qingyuan at the door, as well as other professors and teachers who came over, were all listening with great interest, especially several mathematics professors and doctors of information science, who followed the explanation and thought step by step.
They found that what they said made sense!
Step by step...
The whole process of research and thinking came out, and they suddenly realized, "So this is how they came up with it!"
"This is definitely not made up. It is true. It is linked to the inside of the textbook, step by step, with clear logic and reasonable cause and effect."
"If this is the case, I can figure it out if I think more about it while I'm teaching!"
"It seems that we must pay attention to teaching in the future!"
"Being immersed in research may not necessarily yield results. During the teaching process, basic content is taught, and as long as you are serious and think more, it will be of great help to research!"
…
After Wang Hao answered several questions in a row, he looked at the time and said sorry, "It's time to go to class, I'm sorry."
He pushed aside a group of reporters with dull expressions, went to the office to get something, and then went downstairs to the classroom.
behind.
A group of reporters only felt that their IQs had been insulted, while a group of professors and doctoral lecturers felt that they had gained a lot.
Teacher's door.
Roll call.
Those physics students who had just arrived in the classroom felt the urge to vomit blood when they saw the familiar smiling figure at the door.
Since yesterday, they have been reading news related to Wang Hao, and they are all gossiping with gusto. They don't know the quality of Wang Hao's papers, but they know that Wang Hao is a teaching researcher... very suitable!
The course requirements are strict!
Do you see it?
As the protagonist of public opinion news, Teacher Wang Hao still came to class with great interest, instead of looking for someone to take over the class. He still had a smile on his face and looked like he was in a good mood for class, as if it was someone else who was caught in the whirlpool of public opinion. He Just gossip spectators like them.
"This is too conscientious!"
"I think there is nothing wrong with Teacher Wang Hao as a teaching researcher. I raise my hands and support it 100%. I estimate that there is no one more dedicated than him in the entire university!"
"Yeah, but there's no telling how many days he can teach. Every time a public opinion incident like this happens, the person involved will be fired soon~~"
Students are also very gossipy. Some students use their mobile phones to film or even take videos during class, hoping to post them online to attract clicks and comments.
As long as you don't get caught.
Wang Hao's requirements for courses are still strict, and it can even be said that they are more strict.
play cell phone?
If you are caught, your points will be counted directly, and you may even have your points temporarily confiscated.
The students could only feel the pain and listen carefully to the lectures, and they had persisted until the end of the semester. They did not want to fail the class because they were not serious and received too many marks.
The semester is almost over.
Some students have already begun to count with their hands how many classes are left.
at the same time.
Some reporters had already posted the reports, and the relevant public opinion on the Internet quickly focused on the three reports and analysis.
One article is a video of Wang Hao's entire interview, which attracted many onlookers after it was released.
Then, everyone felt like their intelligence was insulted.
I dont understand!
The second article was about "Huzhou University poaching Wang Hao", "It is suspected that other universities and Abayun are poaching", which attracted a lot of traffic attention.
Another article is a content analysis of a popular V with millions of fans. The title is, "When the Internet is excited about 'posting ten papers every month,' what are people with high IQs doing?"
With pictures, three.
One piece is a collection of several meager pieces of information. Each piece of information is an explanation of the paper and shows that the paper is very valuable.
Incidentally, "People with high IQs are doing science popularization and explaining the value of the paper."
One is the picture content of the second news article, showing a private message conversation in which Huzhou University's official WeChat account invited Wang Hao. It explained various benefits and sincerely invited Wang Hao to work at Huzhou University.
Incidentally, "A group of highly intelligent people are trying to poach the people involved in the incident."
The last picture is a conversation picture. It is rumored to be a group of Penguin Technology Department employees. Several employees are discussing the content of Wang Hao's Fourier transform-assisted construction of mathematical models.
Incidentally, "People with high IQs are researching, studying, and discussing the parties' papers."
As soon as this analytical content was released, it immediately surpassed other content and topped the list of hotly searched topics.
The first reply received more than 10,000 likes in a short period of time, "So, the reaction to events has become a watershed for IQ?"
Article 2, "So, people with high IQs know that the person involved is a talent? We... have low IQs?"
Article 3, "Reported! (•́へ•́╬)"
"..."
