Of course, while Internet media took the lead in reporting relevant news, paper newspapers and TV stations were not far behind.
What is worth mentioning is the world's strongest news promotion channel, TTCV Xinwen Lianbo, which also took nearly 4 minutes.
The news that Sugon Technology solved the problem of 90-nanometer chip production equipment and successfully produced the first purely domestic 90-nanometer chip was reported in a shocking tone.
Among them, the names of Lin Chen, Academician Ni Guangnan, Academician Lu Ke, Academician Guo Ling, Academician Gu An, Professor Xu Duangu and other meritorious officials have frequently appeared in TTCV new articles...
Suddenly, Lin Chen, those academicians and other contributors in the research and development of semiconductor equipment became famous throughout the country.
It can be said that the popularity and reputation of those academicians completely surpassed that of other Daxia academicians, and they have truly reached the pinnacle of life!
After all, although they had become academicians before and reached the pinnacle in the academic field, they were not well understood by the common people.
And this time, as Daxia completely solved the problems of the 90-nanometer process technology, the contributions of these people were naturally mentioned repeatedly.
In this case, they also truly entered the mouths of the people, and truly made the people of Daxia recognize them.
In addition, it is worth mentioning that Professor Xu Duangu has been able to securely obtain the title of academician through this R&D performance and previous R&D achievements.
Unfortunately, the selection of academicians requires a fixed process, so it will take some time for Professor Xu Duangu to be named an academician.
But these are things for the future. At this time, people's focus is not on Professor Xu Duangu's being named an academician.
They were discussing Daxia's solution to the 90nm process technology and what this meant for Daxia...
The overseas media are also quite uneasy.
Their media either reported the rise of Daxia's semiconductor industry in a tone of shock and surprise, or reported the rise of Daxia's semiconductor industry in a tone of horror and concern.
For example, Silicon i Valley Daily, the mouthpiece of Silicon Valley semiconductors, wrote an article with the title "Daxia has made a comprehensive breakthrough in 90-nanometer production equipment. Where should the US semiconductor industry go in the future?"
This article pointed out in a panic tone the fact that the equipment used by Sugon Semiconductor to produce 90-nanometer chips this time was all domestic equipment, and explained what this means.
The final conclusion is naturally disturbing, because it means that Daxia has kept up with the progress of the world's semiconductor manufacturing technology.
It also means that it has become difficult for them in the West to continue to be far ahead of Daxia with their manufacturing technology.
Although the 65-nanometer process technology in the West has now come out, the 45-nanometer process technology is under development.
But how long can the West continue to lead in chip manufacturing technology? Daxia took less than two years to advance the process technology to 90 nanometers.
Give them another two years and they will definitely be able to advance to 65 nanometers or even 45 nanometers. This is bad news for the entire West.
However, while the Western media focused on Daxia's breakthrough in the 90-nanometer process technology, the news reports in the two countries of Germany, Italy and Japan did not focus on Daxia's breakthrough in the 90-nanometer process technology.
Rather, it lies in the surface nanotechnology of metal materials and the Sugon five-axis machining center, because these two countries are powerful countries in precision machining.
When companies from various countries around the world want to produce and process precision machinery or parts, they usually turn to companies from Germany or Japan.
So if the metal material surface nanotechnology and Shuguang five-axis machining center are true, it means that they will usher in a devastating impact on the processing industry!
The reason why it is said to be a devastating impact rather than a shock is because they know that the country of Daxia often turns a good high-end profit into a low-end profit.
Once Daxia enters the precision machining industry, it will be very difficult for the German-Italian and Japanese precision machining industries to maintain high profits. Isn't this bad news?
Under such circumstances, the media in these two countries are also quite hostile to Sugon R&D Center. When reporting news in this area, they always use a hostile or disbelieving tone.
For example, Professor Matsuda Daisuke of Tokyo University, a famous university in the island country, spoke in Tokyo i Daily to refute the fraud of Akebono R&D Center.
It is claimed that it is impossible for Sugon R&D Center to really conquer the five-axis machining center technology, and it is claimed that the five-axis machining center is definitely a fake product to deceive funds like the Daxia "Hanxin" back then.
Among them, a professor from Tokyo University named Daisuke Matsuda found many "doubtful points" in order to add credibility to his words.
He pointed out that Lin Chen only released simple information about Sugon's five-axis machining center, and other specific hardware parameters and even principles were not released, which was really unconvincing.
Of course, the more important evidence is Professor Matsuda Daisuke, who presented the intelligence results he reviewed at the island country’s patent agency.
The intelligence results showed that Sugon Technology was indeed developing a five-axis machining center and had registered thousands of related patents.
However, after searching, Professor Matsuda Daisuke found that these patents are only minor patents, such as appearance patents, general structure patents, software control method patents, linear motor patents and other minor patents.
These thousands of patents may appear to be fine on the surface, but in fact they are missing the most important and critical core part.
As for what the core technology patents are, there are many core technology patents.
For example, the internal structural details of the five-axis machining center that cannot be seen from the outside, such as the core code of the CNC system.
For example, how to machine high-precision spindle spindle processing technology, such as how to produce high-precision cutting tools...
Many core technologies of Sugon's five-axis machining center have not been registered as patents. What is registered is only some things that can be seen by the outside world, and the core parts are not registered.
In this case, the most important core technology patent has not been registered. This makes people doubt whether the Sugon five-axis machining center is genuine or fake.
Of course, in addition to this, Professor Matsuda Daisuke also used a series of industry data and the situation of a certain company.
Point out how difficult it is to actually build a five-axis machining center, and point out the fact that the development difficulty of a five-axis machining center is not much worse than that of a photolithography machine.
Therefore, Professor Matsuda Daisuke’s article directly claimed that Sugon R&D Center was committing fraud and Daxia did not really develop a five-axis machining center!
The so-called five-axis machining center is just a PPT, just a product to defraud Daxia’s R&D funds!
I have to say that although this article is a bit biased, the doubts and difficulties he points out are indeed very convincing. Finally, he adds the expert status of the professor from the island country "Eastern University".
After reading Professor Matsuda Daisuke's article, many readers in the island country also felt that the Sugon R&D Center was committing fraud and defrauding funds!
(End of chapter)
