However, when people were filled with emotion, Ni Guangnan did not stop speaking. He continued to speak:
“The facts are the facts and there is no need for me to lie.
Okay, since Lin Chen invited me to the stage, let me introduce to you the news about the Phoenix S1 mobile phone chip. "
Hearing this, people at the scene paused for a moment, and then temporarily put aside their surprise that Lin Chen's contribution to mobile phone chips reached 60%.
Instead, I focused on the Phoenix S1 mobile phone chip mentioned by Ni Guangnan. Ni Guangnan said so much about this Phoenix S1 mobile phone before, but I don’t know what the specific situation is?
In response, the projection screen behind him quickly changed instantly and turned into a comparison chart of the two chips.
The one on the left is the Texas Instruments OMAP1710 mobile phone processor, and the one on the right is the Phoenix S1 mobile phone chip.
Seeing this, people moved their eyes left and right to compare the performance parameters of the two mobile phones.
Texas Instruments OMAP1710 mobile phone chip.
Application platform: Motorola V1 mobile phone.
Process technology: 90 nanometers.
Whether the communication chip is built-in: Yes.
Communication chip: supports the latest GPRS Class 12 communication standard, with built-in integrated GPRS Class 12 communication module.
CPU model: ARM926 (ARM9 series, 32-bit RISC reduced instruction set, 5-level pipeline design...)
CPU frequency: 220MHz.
Level 1 cache: 32KB.
Hardware acceleration: JAVA hardware acceleration.
The graph shows whether the GPU is independent: No.
CPU area: 12×12 mm2.
Packaging method: m-BGA packaging method. …
Phoenix S1 mobile phone chip
Process technology: 130 nanometers.
Whether the communication chip is built-in: No.
Application platform: Sugon F2 mobile phone, Sugon A2 mobile phone.
CPU model: Phoenix S1 core (32-bit RISC reduced instruction set, 6-level pipeline design...)
CPU frequency: 200MHz.
Level 1 cache: 64KB.
Hardware acceleration: JAVA hardware acceleration.
Dynamic Turbo Frequency: Phoenix Dynamic Turbo Frequency Technology (supports chip frequency increase from 10% to 120%)
Is the graphics display GPU independent: Yes.
GPU model: Phoenix T10 graphics display core.
CPU area: 14×14 mm2.
Packaging method: m-BGA packaging method.
At this time, people at the scene looked at the data parameters above, especially when they saw that among the two mobile phone processors, the CPU frequency of the Phoenix mobile phone chip was 20MHz lower than that of Texas Instruments.
When it was only 200MHz, people looked puzzled.
What's going on?
Didn’t Ni Guangnan say before that the Phoenix mobile phone chip used 130 nanometers to defeat the 90 nanometer Texas Instruments mobile phone processor? Why is the result like this now?
Are you sure Ni Guangnan was right about what he said before? Are you sure 130nm beat 90nm?
Why is the frequency of Phoenix mobile phone chip now so much lower than that of Texas Instruments OMAP1710?
You must know that in this era, many people are willing to pay money for a 20MHz increase. As a result, the chip frequency of the Phoenix mobile phone chip is 20MHz less. Is this definitely beating the Motorola OMAP1710 mobile phone chip?
Of course, the Phoenix mobile phone chip is not without its highlights. In the comparison chart, they keenly discovered that the Phoenix mobile phone chip has a technology called dynamic turbo frequency.
The dynamic turbo frequency technology allows the chip's operating frequency to automatically adjust from 10% to 120%.
The working frequency reaches 120%, which 120% represents overclocking!
This overclocking is a brand new innovation in mobile phones. Although overclocking can only achieve 120% and only increase by 20%, this is also the world's first mobile phone chip that can automatically overclock.
As for the independent GPU in the future, it is indeed a highlight. Before this, the graphics display of mobile phone chips was directly integrated into the CPU.
At this time, Sugon Technology has directly separated the graphics display. This is also an unprecedented innovation. What kind of experience can the graphics display, that is, the independent GPU, bring to the mobile phone?
Of course, only a few are knowledgeable. Most of the nearly 3,000 people present did not understand mobile phone chips. They only knew a few parameters, such as the key value of CPU frequency.
So when they saw the performance comparison parameters at the press conference, they expressed doubts.
I asked Ni Guangnan if he had said something wrong just now, saying that 130 nanometers defeated 90 nanometers.
In response, Ni Guangnan also came to his senses from the projection screen behind him, and then turned to look at Lin Chen.
Ni Guangnan has not seen the PPT of this press conference, so I don’t know what the next page is.
Seeing this, Lin Chen also waved his hand, and then a mobile software running score comparison picture called "AnTuTu Mobile Open Source Performance Test" appeared on it.
In this running score picture, the running scores of the Phoenix S1 mobile phone chip and the Texas Instruments OMAP1710 mobile phone chip appear respectively.
The running scores include total scores and other scores. Among them, the Phoenix mobile phone chip's CPU running score, GPU running score and first-level cache, etc., comprehensively crushed the Texas Instruments OMAP1710 mobile phone chip!
As for their scores, the Phoenix S1 mobile phone chip has a total score of 2590 points, the CPU score is 946, and the GPU score: 1357 points...
Texas Instruments OMAP1710 mobile phone chip has a total score of 1924 points, a CPU score of 875 points, and a GPU score of 731 points...
Looking at the effect comparison picture above, everyone at the scene showed a look of astonishment. They did not expect that the result would be like this.
The CPU frequency of the Phoenix S1 mobile phone chip is obviously 20MHz less than that of Texas Instruments. How come it is the Phoenix S1 mobile phone chip that wins in the end?
What’s even more shocking is that the Phoenix S1 mobile phone chip actually crushed the Texas Instruments OMAP1710 mobile phone chip in all aspects.
Whether it is the computing power of mobile phones or the graphics display capabilities, they have all been defeated. Among them, the Texas Instruments OMAP1710 mobile phone chip has failed in terms of mobile phone CPU computing capabilities.
However, there are not many mobile phone chips that Sugon has caught up with. The performance gap is only about 7% at most, which is not too big.
But in terms of graphics display, the performance of Texas Instruments' mobile phone processor was simply disgraceful. Sugon Technology knocked it to the ground and beat it. The performance gap between them was almost doubled.
Through this scene, people at the scene also realized the power of the mobile phone's independent graphics chip GPU.
It turns out that after the GPU of this mobile phone processor is independent, it is the same as the independent graphics card and integrated graphics card on the computer. The performance of the integrated graphics card is simply eye-catching.
Perhaps the only function of the integrated graphics card is to display images, animations and videos. As for what is better, it still has to fall on the independent graphics card, and the same seems to be true for mobile phones.
So people who realized this quickly showed crazy eyes.
But soon, their crazy eyes shifted from Ni Guangnan to Lin Chen.
After all, if they remembered correctly, Ni Guangnan just said that Lin Chen's contribution reached more than 60%!
Thinking of this, countless people showed shocked expressions to Lin Chen, and looked at Lin Chen with eyes full of horror.
At this time, what Lin Chen didn't know was that Galvin, the president of Motorola, looked very ugly at the VIP table.
(End of chapter)
