Well, I have finally returned to a more stable rhythm and can maintain an update every two days, so I will try my best to write a small theater for everyone to enjoy.
You may have also noticed that this book seems to have the ability to attract, let us use "interesting" (in English) readers. Although I am grateful to the two moderators of this book (as well as the one who always suffers from convulsions, although he often accidentally hurts me), there are basically some book reviews that are not to my taste, and they will disappear in time.
But unfortunately, there are still some remarks that have entered my field of vision to a greater or lesser extent. Because of occupational diseases, I always like to analyze and classify them. On a whim after finishing my work today, I will explain it to you:
The animal world - duh.
Human society, the ecology of the comment area.
Classification and subspecies of great critics (with personal complaints).
Okay, applause, applause.
So first we want to introduce to you the most common type of great critic——
I named it: tailor-made.
Classic remarks:
"The plot here is too long. Don't put the background introduction at the beginning, it's better to put it at the end. The protagonist's name is too long and others can't remember it. There are too few heroines and it's better to have more. The plot is not compact enough. Magic There are too few descriptive elements, so it’s best to start revising it like this, otherwise readers won’t like it, and the book will fail if written like this, which makes people uncomfortable.”
Well, at first glance, it doesn’t make sense. It seems like it’s pointing out the author’s shortcomings for the author’s benefit, right?
Okay so let's switch concepts.
"This book has too many words, which makes reading very tiring. The author's writing makes readers very uncomfortable. The author should draw it into comics so that it looks comfortable. Otherwise, readers will not like it."
Hey, is it starting to taste wrong?
Then continue to change the concept.
"Although this book has pictures, the lines still have to be expressed in words, which looks very uncomfortable. The author had better provide dubbing. Otherwise, this book will not be successful, or readers will not like this book and it will fail. ."
(Shrugs) Well, do you think I'm twisting the topic?
But, in all fairness, is there really a difference?
Every reader is a different person. Even if they have experienced similar education, their own knowledge and understanding abilities are different, and their views on the same things are not consistent.
He likes harems and those with multiple heroines. You just hate harems and multiple heroines.
He likes the protagonist to be a magician, and you like the protagonist to be a swordsman.
He likes farming stories with detailed descriptions of scenery, while you like refreshing and upgrading stories in one stroke.
Is there right or wrong between the two? Is it doomed to failure just because a certain point does not suit his or your taste?
No.
There are so many categories in online novels because it is difficult for everyone to agree on them. If you don't like this book and it doesn't suit your taste, then you can read other books.
"If it doesn't suit my taste, it's wrong. You have to change this here and here, you have to change this here, you have to change that there, and you have to change that there too."
Sir, do you want me to help you make this book, carefully tan the cowhide cover, add brass corners, and then package it and deliver it to you personally?
Don't you just try to represent so many lovely dear readers with colorful personalities?
The description of the scenery that you think is very wordy, others find it very delicate, picturesque and comfortable.
If you want me to change it, fine.
If you want me to change it to suit your taste, fine.
You have to pay, right?
If I change it to suit your taste, then you have to make up for the income lost by readers who don't like it, right?
If you want it tailor-made, you have to pay for it.
"If you don't change it, I will abandon the book."
Then give it up and hope you find a book you like.
The world doesn't revolve around you, honey. If you don't like this book, someone else will. My efforts are not recognized by you, nor by others.
(This is why I call this type of tailor-made critic. They will ask questions that are clearly their own preferences, and then forcibly raise them to the level of readers' preferences, or even to the level of writing itself, attacking me for not doing so. I am qualified to write a book. Oh, of course, there are many people who do such analysis who are also authors themselves. Certainly, I am not qualified to write a book because I have so many mistakes they listed. For example, I used so many words in this paragraph. A comma, even, even, chaos, use of, pause, and punctuation, so of course, I, who have made such fatal mistakes, are far inferior to them in writing, who are completely incapable of making mistakes, and the books I write can easily be famous all over the world. Famous, top-notch author.
Assuming they actually write the book (shrug))
Well, the first one is too common so it’s a bit long to write, so let’s introduce the second one to you.
Real world critic.
In this case, I will quote two book reviews that actually existed in my book review area, and you can experience it yourself.
"How could the first murder in the real world have such a reaction? The author must have written it randomly."
(Sorry, I have never killed anyone, so I can only guess and write. Can you please describe your life experience? It is best to tell me your nearest police station and the local police phone number——)
"The author's description of the dragon is wrong. He refers to the skeleton of a bird. Dragons in the real world are not like this at all."
()
()
(I didn’t expect that my book would also have readers who are travelers from another world. I’m so honored)
"In European history——"
(But I write fantasy)
"In the real world——"
(But I write fictional novels)
Hmm~~
e
Please experience it yourself.
Then let me introduce the third type to you. This type is almost as common as the first type, and there is often overlap between the two.
This one, I call it.
A big critic who blames others.
This is also the most common type in today's online society. I believe you can see a lot of it in various places.
Normally, we have an opinion because we see something, and then we start to reason and demonstrate because of this thing, and finally confirm whether our opinion is correct - this is the thinking of a logical person.
The unique thing about the criticizing critics is that they do not prove their opinions through reasoning and argumentation.
Instead, a point of view is generated first, and then reasoning and argumentation are made around this point of view just to prove its correctness.
So the following is a label that many readers of this book know about me, and its dialectical process. Please experience it for yourself.
"This book is very young." (proposing an argument)
"Where is the sun getting lighter?" (The opponent asked the origin of the argument and why they think the sun is getting lighter)
"The words "boy" and "girl" are used in the novel" (note that this is his initial point of view, which means that he thinks my book is young because of this)
"Isn't this Chinese? You can actually tell Riqing. What do you do with those classical Chinese texts that have teenage and girlish vocabulary?" (Strong and informative rebuttal)
"Where did Rigaru come from so much nonsense? Only Rigaru knows so many nonsense lines" (???Roy question mark, didn't you think it was Rigaru at first because of the words "boys and girls")
"Many historical novels also have a lot of lines. Shakespeare's works also have a lot of lines. Operas are still expressed with sung lines." (Second informative rebuttal)
"Look at this rhetorical device. There is no such use in Chinese. It is obviously a Japanese translation, or a wrong translation." ()
"Then how do you translate this paragraph into English?"
"Anyway, this is wrong. This is Riqing."
Hmm~~
It's a little confusing for you to read, and it's easy for readers who have a rhythm to figure it out.
Still using the method of converting concepts.
Generally speaking, how do we judge whether a horse is a horse?
If you are a professional, you may start with various muscles, physique, skull shape, ears, mane, etc. But when we ordinary people have to judge, of course we have to look at the appearance, right?
If it looks like a horse, we think it is, and then it is later proven that it is actually a mule. We think "ah--so that's it" and then change our views, and learn relevant knowledge to enrich ourselves and ensure that You won't make the same mistake every time, right?
So the above conversation, borrowing an idiom story and slightly modifying it, becomes like this.
"This is a horse." (pointing to a toad)
"Well, why do you think it's a horse?"
"Because it has bright eyes."
"Because it has strong legs."
"Because it has this, because it has that."
Behavior like this that continues to change the topic in an attempt to prove one's own point is a characteristic of the hating style. They are not trying to prove correctness through dialectics because they have seen something, but they have already arrived at a point of view and are proving their correctness through dialectics.
You ask him why he thinks this is the case, and he raises one point, and then when you refute it, he raises another point.
It wasn't just because he saw this that he thought it was so. Instead, after coming to such a conclusion, you deliberately look for these points to prove yourself.
This behavior is called "confirmation bias" in psychology.
It manifests itself in "ignoring all evidence that is unfavorable to one's own statements, and only seeing those evidences that corroborate one's statements."
Among the 100 roses, one is blue, and the other 99 are red. They can then conclude that "roses are blue".
Then the above three types, after they jumped out to cause trouble, but were banned.
I will also go to other places to promote it.
The author cannot be flattered, the author has a bad character, and the author has a bad temper.
Well, what can I say.
I hope you can learn to think and learn to distinguish what conclusions are truly drawn through logical thinking. Don't be fooled by these moral kidnappings mixed with personal subjective views, and have your own opinions.
Whether the book is good or not is up to you to read. What others say is good may not necessarily be suitable for you, and what others say is bad is just their own experience.
Luo Libasuo wrote a lot, and in the end he didn’t know what he had written.
I hope you all enjoyed watching this small theater.
I guess I'm just not in a good mood and just want to write something. I'm not so busy when I'm busy.
Good night.
