I have understood one thing more clearly in the past two days,
Whether a book is good or not is reasonable has a lot to do with the reader's enjoyment. But when he feels unhappy, he will think you are unreasonable.
A reader who joined the group said, what have you written recently?
When I replied to him and said that I could post the contextual factors to him, he didn’t want to read it and said it three times in a row.
Write whatever you want, and then just leave the group.
Today I have another message from the previous chapter: So why did you suddenly wake up? Then you just let him continue to be crazy.
You just left when the author kept replying, why did you ask?
I feel like some readers really waste the author's time;
(You can also think that the author is wasting your time, but remember that the author has never sent you another private message)
I really made a mistake, you said, I can correct it if I can.
I asked you that day, which paragraph do you disagree with? I can continue to explain.
I also spent time looking for foreshadowing in the previous text to show you, but people immediately backed out.
I couldn't convince the author, and I didn't want to discuss it. I just kept saying it's up to you.
...
I was asked about typos in this book, and I still had them last week. When I saw them, I basically managed to correct them in seconds.
I also responded privately to people who said they didn’t understand some of the plot.
I have responded to many people who said that I used place names incorrectly or that the system was wrong.
For example, in the Thain system, book friends said I used the machine gun wrongly.
I said: OK, thank you, I don’t understand, I will try my best to patch it. (I also patched it later)
If you don’t believe it, start reading from the first chapter now.
Some of them are correct, but book friends put forward new opinions. After I adopted them, I also added them.
For example, in Chapter 188, a book friend named President felt that under the circumstances, it would be better to coax people, so I wrote a few hundred more words.
This change took nearly an hour.
If you read it carefully, if you mention anything that makes sense, or if you use friendly words, I basically won’t ignore it.
Human emotions are very complex, and their expression and experience are multi-dimensional and are also affected by heredity, environment, cultural background, personal experience, etc.
There is love, fear, resentment, jealousy, guilt, shame, unwillingness,
There are still many changes in frequency and frequency.
The protagonist went to the battlefield and was slashed with a sword, but the injury healed.
What is not described may be the inflammation and panic during the process, or even the knight who is afraid of holding the sword in the future, or becomes braver, or wets his pants on the battlefield.
Every change is reasonable. You can’t say that it’s wrong if you don’t agree with it.
There is nothing called necessary or unnecessary.
In the game Medieval Kingdom, the protagonist gets gluttony, and the data changes in the game.
In the middle, he may become addicted to food, then become addicted to alcohol, and even eat fat. If he eats, he will die early due to health problems.
The game becomes paranoid, but the numbers change and the chance of discovering the conspiracy becomes higher.
Among them, there are people. People are creatures half covered by darkness.
In a modern society governed by the rule of law, if you turn on the news, you can see bizarre and magical things done by normal people, even successful people, every day.
As the protagonist, he can manipulate the country of law at will. Come on, tell me,
I laid a lot of foreshadowing from the first chapter, his hatred, his unwillingness, his pride,
A lot of things happened in the middle. If I search using pressure, I can find many keywords.
In the game, being brave just means fighting harder.
In many battles, bravery may induce this person to be cruel, stubborn, and irritable.
What is a normal person and what is a madman?
The author uses many cases of Chinese and foreign figures as reference.
Before you use emotional words, please think about whether what you say makes sense.
Have you tried to figure out the character's thoughts?
Some book friends said earlier that it looked like Gong Dou, but my reply was that I suggested abandoning the book.
Because others ask questions, this question is not about correcting mistakes or having different views on the plot, but is about a sense of experience.
Your experience is up to you.
The author proposes three methods to solve the problem:
1. Say I will rewrite the law in the future.
2. Not responding.
3. It is recommended not to read it.
I was originally going to choose 2, but this book friend has been chasing books. After I updated the update, the vote for the first chapter seemed to be from him.
I think it would be better to respond.
So I chose 3 again, but I didn’t feel that this issue couldn’t be discussed, so I said you can convince me.
Readers should not argue with the author on some issues.
Book friends are not happy with it, so they can read the X version or whatever, but I can’t control it.
I have also answered many questions from trainee book friends.
But many people came to tell the author about what he wrote, and if they really argued with them, they just fell silent.
Not just once.
The average author writes more than 100 hours a month and over 100,000 words.
Some people can read it in half an hour. You can understand the changes in the characters more deeply than the author.
Sometimes what the author writes is not what you think, which does not mean that he is wrong.
(In the future, the word count standard for the author's reply will be increased. Book friends who want the author's response are advised to write a few hundred words)
(You don’t need to ask the book friend who quit the group. I have already deleted the message. I will delete whatever I post after I see it. If I curse people or books, I will ban them. The author doesn’t owe you anything.)
(I only created the group to facilitate discussion of characters, plot evolution, and rational discussion, but it did not achieve the desired effect)
(Those who subscribed to the full reading, if you have questions in the future, please ask again. Your response standards have not improved. I will do it again if I want to start a group meeting again.)
(Thank you to the book friends who discussed the plot, supplemented information, and gave me suggestions when I joined the group.)
