After the death of Rabbi Lins, I am not sure how readers will feel about it, but as a somewhat "anti-traditional" story design, I would like to express my own opinions.
I believe that in the minds of many people, Rabbi Lins Pompey is very strong. It is undeniable that if he were not hit hard and targeted, his strength could even be used as a boss in the middle of the story.
However, due to the plot setting, the conflict between him and Alicia broke out in Ocean City in the early stages of the story, which created a situation where the outcome of this conflict had to be arranged in Ocean City.
As an aside, I think this setup is actually good. The development of the world story will not progress according to the development of the protagonist. For example, it does not wait until the protagonist is strong enough to meet an opponent like Rabbi Lins. This adds believability to the circumstances of the story.
A very important point I want to make is that it seems that Rabbi Lins was killed by Sean and Alicia jointly, but in fact his death was more like a "self-destruction".
In fact, it can be seen that Rabbi Lins Pompeo and Charles Kennedy are very similar - they have strong hard power, but they have huge flaws in personality.
Therefore, Rabbi Lins's failure was more due to his personality defects and his failure after being tempted by power...
It's not that the strength is not as good as Xiao Ai Alliance.
Therefore, my suggestion is not to be surprised by Rabbi Lins’ defeat, because this is the case in this world. Panel data alone is not enough, understanding, decision-making and mind are more important.
Rabbi Lins Pompey's twisted heart made him a little confused. Such a hugely flawed person was actually quite good.
It's just that the food is not obvious, but his food is hidden under the gorgeous halo.
The same goes for Charles Kennedy, who also has a twisted personality.
This kind of personality determines that they are "strong men who look strong", but actually have weaknesses that can lead to "self-destruction".
This is why, after designing "The First Rescue of Arya" and "Slaying the Lion", I always felt that I was out of tune with some readers who had objections.
Strength is not the strength of the panel value. This is the story, not a "battle simulator".
I know that my way of writing is a bit "rebellious", but if you are always talking about "refining Qi and fighting Yuanying", and are always obsessed with the idea of upgrading and fighting monsters in online games, you may not be able to understand that I wrote the Boss as a living person. What kind of good intentions people have.
You will still be scolded and not understood.
But I know that although it may lead to incomprehension, my creation is from the heart.
If a creator doesn't even have such courage and courage, it will be difficult for him to achieve any progress or breakthrough in what he does.
Then again, in fact, the design concept of the story about challenging Kennedy and slaughtering the lion is very obvious:
The destruction of Rabbi Lins and Kennedy is closer to "self-destruction". The protagonist and even Alicia's team just happened to step on the wave of their self-destruction.
Therefore, it depends on how you understand the story.
If we look at the battle results alone, some readers think that Sean's performance is a bug. This understanding is too simple and crude and inappropriate.
Because in such an incident, Sean is just a part of their self-destruction process.
However, he is the central protagonist, so naturally I gave him the "key action" and that was it.
In addition, let’s talk about another way of looking at this early confrontation.
Jack, Queen, King...these are just levels of explorers.
What if in the middle and later stages of the story, the person fighting against is God?
Thinking about it this way, these people with their own shortcomings, even the Joker class, are indeed not incredible "powerful enemies".
Logically speaking, as an author, there is no need to explain so much about his creations.
However, speaking these out is also a way to sort out my own thoughts.
I also express some of the criticism that some friends cannot understand and criticize me.
Friends who hold the "Qi Refining and Nascent Soul Theory", I would like to say that if you always put your own understanding above the author's writing, this will lead to the "homogenization" of your own reading experience, which will lead to the "homogenization" of the author's creation. Narrowing", because if all kinds of "dogma" and "hidden rules" are always proposed, some authors will not know what to do.
In short...it is them who criticize "routines", and they are also the ones who defend "dogma"...
What do you want me to write?
(╯‵□′)╯︵┻━┻
Of course, it is impossible to think that just because my arrangement is logical, the market can understand it...
Whether it will be understood by the market, I don’t know. Anyway, I wrote it seriously according to my own ideas, so I feel free from guilt.
Also, readers who understand what I'm saying and enjoy this story, I love you.
Regarding writing, I will still take it seriously.
