"Dear" has a lot of comments and the topic is very popular, which shows that the audience has a high degree of participation, or a strong sense of involvement.
This is indeed a good thing, and the reviews given to this film by film critics and the media are equally polarizing!
Although there are more positive reviews than negative reviews, it also shows that movies with sensitive themes are really difficult to make!
There is nothing to say about the biggest controversy in "Dear". It must be Li Hongqin, or the second half of the movie!
Many movie fans are even arguing about it.
Some people questioned: "In the film, Tian Peng can clearly talk to adults. The child does not know the human trafficker Yang Mingfu and knows the situation of his parents. If such a child is kidnapped, doesn't Li Hongqin, the wife of the human trafficker, know that he was abducted?"
Also, is it possible for this child to completely forget his biological parents in such a short period of time? Therefore, judging from the setting of the movie, it is very blunt to say that Li Hongqin was unaware. "
However, some people doubted it and some people refuted it.
"The question above seems reasonable, but it is too subjective. First of all, the movie does not clearly tell us that Li Hongqin really did not know. This can also be seen later in the conversation between Li Hongqin and lawyer Gao Xia. out.
This is a plot for the audience to understand on their own!
Moreover, Tian Peng was only three years old at the time. A child of this age was taken away. The memory of a child of this age is limited. I am the father myself. The child was only left with his grandparents for a week. After he came back, he actually I'm a little unfamiliar with it, let alone a few years ago. "
Others questioned whether Jifang was abducted:
"It's very outrageous. It seems difficult to prove whether Jifang was abducted, right? A worker who has a good relationship with the trafficker saw it? The question is what exactly did this worker see? There was no real footage. After abducting Jifang, he put it in the It is also possible that the construction site caused the illusion of an abandoned baby. All of Li Hongqin's moral support lies in the fact that Jifang was abandoned, but the bottom line given by the movie is very vague. Her man is dead, and there is no strong logical support or direct explanation. Bai's expression. If there is a possibility that Yoshifang was abducted, then this movie has not adhered to the basic moral bottom line.
Moreover, can one person’s words be used as evidence? He agreed to testify after Li Hongqin offered his body in exchange. Can such evidence be used? "
However, fans quickly refuted it.
“I just wonder, why are there so many people who think that this is what the movie is supposed to express?
The movie never seems to tell us clearly whether Ji Fang was abducted.
The movie only gives these clues, and one more, Li Hongqin’s moral support? This seems to be what you think too, right? The movie never sympathizes with this woman, does it? All I saw was all kinds of abuse that made her lose everything.
Does she know it? In fact, it is not the key at all. Just like those families who buy children, are there few in this society? The only difference between them and Li Hongqin is that they don’t have any family members of the trafficker!
But in fact, there is no harm if there is no business. If the movie tells you directly, you may say it is preaching. Just like the ending of Li Hongqin's pregnancy, can you say that the movie wants to give the audience warmth? But why not a more cruel start?
So, don’t think about everything. Do you think that the movie just tells such a story and does not make us sympathize with Li Hongqin. Even the lawyer is willing to help Li Hongqin because he is also a family member of the criminal and feels the same way. ! "
Soon there were rebuttals to other people's rebuttals.
"As it is said in the movie: child abduction is one of the most inhumane crimes. But please don't set up a whitewashing plot full of loopholes. Chinese filmmakers just like to use vague official language, and this is also true when it comes to big rights and wrongs. Anyway, If I don't make it clear, I have no responsibility. I'm afraid of taking responsibility. How can I make a socially responsible movie? Films doing this are tantamount to pushing all the moral baggage to the audience, allowing the audience to identify themselves under unclear conditions. Of course, this kind of Recognition is strongly induced through cinema.
The same goes for Tian Peng. As long as the movie gives a few minutes of footage, no matter what time period it is, explain the situation when Tian Peng first arrived at Li Hongqin's house, explain clearly how the traffickers deceived him, and explain clearly why Li Hongqin could trust such a big child. , the children who did not know her or her husband at all, and had no memory of their own family, were the children of his husband and another woman. Naturally, moral issues can be eliminated, but why not add them? This is deliberately confusing the public and is irresponsible! "
"I laughed. According to what you said, when making a movie, there can't be any obscure scenes? As long as there is unknown information, it must be clearly explained? How long should such a movie be? The time for making a TV series is not enough, right?
What else can't be taken responsibility for if you don't make it clear? There is a word called "understanding", okay? If everything has to be explained clearly, is it still a movie? Everything is shot according to reality. It is a documentary, not a movie! If I actually filmed it as you said, you would probably think again, is this woman stupid? Can you believe such an obvious lie?
Of course, this is also my family's opinion. Anyway, I think whether Li Hongqin knows or not becomes a topic of discussion, which is the real essence of this movie! "
"Honey" is certainly not a perfect movie!
It's impossible for there to be no bugs at all, and it's even less possible for everyone to like this kind of movie.
Controversy is inevitable.
For example, in the movie, it takes 24 hours to open a case.
Even after explaining the timeline in the movie and the fact that Sun Bin and others experienced this, some people still feel that the movie is misleading the audience.
Controversy is not a bad thing, it just shows that the audience is serious about watching the movie.
Moreover, the rating of "Dear" exceeds eight points, which can also explain some problems.
There is controversy, but the positive reviews clearly outweigh the negative reviews.
This is actually a good thing for the promotion of the movie.
You must know that a movie like "Dear" is naturally not a commercial movie purely to please the audience and earn box office.
Therefore, if you want to get higher box office and let more people buy tickets to watch, a certain degree of controversy is actually a good thing.
Because only when there is controversy can the topic of a movie be heated up. If there is really no controversy, then there are only two possibilities, either it is a classic or it is a bad movie.
"Dear" focuses on anti-trafficking-themed movies. It can be said that most movies with similar themes are similar to the first half of "Dear", or the routines are similar.
The focus is on the process of searching.
On the contrary, the controversial second half of "Dear" is what sets it apart from other films of the same type.
7017k
