Some readers expressed that they were dissatisfied with recent articles and had suggestions and opinions from various aspects. Many even had opinions on the author's choice of words and sentences.
Perhaps this book has achieved decent results, but I am still the same new author as before, and I have not developed an indifferent mentality at all.
I still care about everyone's comments as always.
So under these comments, I admit that my mentality has been greatly affected during this period of time.
Before I wrote about internal affairs, I thought that some readers would have opinions, and I also thought that some readers would be lost. After all, compared to war, internal affairs is indeed not that attractive.
But for an author, I feel that if a historical article does not have a corresponding internal affairs chapter, it should be considered incomplete, or regrettable.
Many readers also suggested that I should follow the current trend and write about reforming military academies, setting up staff offices, and copying all the political, economic, and cultural reforms of later generations. In this way, perhaps internal affairs will not be so boring.
For example, the development of black technologies such as making guns and cannons, reforming the imperial examinations, and so on.
After all, the starting point now is not the starting point ten years ago.
Many readers don't care about the political system that was in line with social productivity in the Han Dynasty, nor do they want to care about why aristocratic families were able to occupy places. They just want to see very handsome and eye-catching reform chapters, rather than relatively real but boring chapters. Internal affairs chapter.
But I really can’t write it like this.
The reason why I started writing books in the first place was that I didn’t like historical texts that were too divorced from reality. I didn’t want to violate my original intention of writing a book.
In fact, it is very easy for me to write like this, because I can grab a lot of them at the starting point, and I can just click on an article at will, modify some content and move it over.
It’s convenient and hassle-free, and I don’t need to buy a lot of information to look up.
But I personally think that if the author of a chapter does not have his own independent conception, then it is water in the true sense, and it is also the most irresponsible to the readers.
I am just telling you the author's true thoughts.
I know that in the final analysis, I am still useless and cannot write articles that all readers will like.
Looking at those comments and the subscriptions that were far inferior to the original ones, I felt that it was time for me to adjust my mentality.
Because even my choice of words and sentences have dissatisfied some readers, which is equivalent to fundamentally negating all recent chapters, so what mentality do I have to code words?
I will continue to write according to my outline as always, but I really have to adjust my mentality.
Sincerely say thank you to those readers who have supported this book, even if you may have left.
I would also like to sincerely say sorry to the readers who have been following me recently. I'm sorry.
Congratulations to the author.
