“In the past two years, domestic development in the field of science and technology has advanced by leaps and bounds. In many fields, we have caught up with or even surpassed developed countries in Europe and the United States.
Huaguo Seed Industry Group, for example, has developed so fast in recent years that I can’t even comprehend it. A large number of high-quality genetically modified seeds have not only occupied more than 95% of the market in China.
The seeds of Huaguo Seed Industry Group also account for more than 60% of the genetically modified seed industry market worldwide, forcing Monsanto to massively lay off employees worldwide. At Bayer, the entire branch related to the genetically modified seed industry was laid off.
Syngenta, the seed industry giant previously acquired by Huaguo, has been fully taken over by Huaguo Seed Industry Group. Syngenta, which was previously unwilling to let Huaguo interfere with their work, is now asking Huaguo to fully take over.
Deep Blue Storage's biological storage server is the only one in the world. In order to import Beiming-1, America and the Europa Union are even willing to open certain loopholes to China in the Pakistan Agreement.
In the field of aerospace, our traditional strength, we successfully launched the first lunar space station in human history before Amerikan did.
Recently, it seems that astronauts are about to go to the lunar space station to perform scientific research missions.
The above mentioned are all government-led scientific research projects. Huaguo Seed Industry Group and Deep Blue Storage are both central enterprises directly managed by the government.
We have made amazing progress in government-led scientific research projects in recent years, but the development of the Internet giants in the field of scientific research is lackluster.
Traditional manufacturing companies have good R&D output, but the profits of these manufacturing companies are very slim.
On the contrary, these Internet giants in China have made a lot of profits by relying on China's vast market, but they do not have much hard technology that they can use.
Take Goose Factory as an example. As a virtual monopoly in the social field, it has made a lot of money by controlling the traffic portal and publishing various skin-changing games.
With an annual net profit of more than 200 billion RMB, it can only innovate models and make no contribution to China's scientific and technological development.
Ali finally came up with cloud computing. Gouchang saw that other people’s cloud computing was very effective, so I also built Gouchang Cloud.
Huawei's annual profit is about half that of Goose Factory, but Huawei's R&D investment is nearly three times that of Goose Factory.
Although Huawei has many controversial aspects, it is much better than Goose Factory in terms of R&D investment.
The private companies with the top domestic net profits all want to follow the path that others have taken and imitate other people's products. To put it bluntly, it is plagiarism.
It is said to be an Internet giant, but how many influential open source projects has it really produced?
Things have been a little better in the past two years, with a VR operating system finally coming out.
The biggest gap between us and American lies in the contribution of private enterprises to technological development. The gap is too far.
Americen has a series of giants such as Apple, Google, SpaceX, and Oracle that have technological innovations in different fields.
There are also open source companies such as RedHat, OpenStack, MySQL AB, etc. I know these, and there are countless R&D companies focusing on niche fields.
The private enterprises that have really taken advantage of China's resources have invested little in research and development and produced almost no output.
Instead, it relies on manufacturing companies with razor-thin profits to produce output.
Before Merlin appeared in front of a global audience, many people already knew about it.
It was also at that time that domestic giants began to recruit fresh graduates from the Department of Mathematics and Astronomy.
At that time, graduates from the Department of Mathematics and Astronomy could receive higher salaries than coders because they knew about the existence of Magic Coin.
And the existence of magic has been confirmed from some sources.
I suspect that China's rapid progress in the field of scientific research has a lot to do with magic.
Speaking of which, why was Apple the first company to mine magic coin?
Determined by corporate genes, although domestic companies have resources, they do not have the corresponding environment and mechanisms.
Past causes lead to present effects
I believe that the first domestic giant to mine magic coin is either Huawei or Kechuang Biotech. "
The news that Apple obtained the Magic Brain triggered heated discussions around the world. Except for Amerikan, no other country expected that Apple would disclose the live video of the Magic Brain.
Scientists who consider themselves to be the best in their field are interested in magic and the systems behind it.
A large number of self-recommended emails were sent to Apple's designated mailbox.
Amid the disturbances from the outside world, Amerikan successfully completed the moon landing plan.
Lindgren led Hines and Watkins to implement this moon landing.
Lindgren and Hines are white men, and Watkins is a black woman.
Watkins is the first black woman in history to enter the International Space Station.
Amerikan has a manned moon landing plan in 2024, and no one can object to letting her go there.
"There need to be black footprints on the moon." A black political activist said after Watkins successfully landed on the moon.
The combination of two white and one black perfectly fits Amerikan’s political correctness.
"Apollo 18, the moon landing program finally restarted. You know, when I was a kid, I would always be obsessed with the story of the Apollo moon landing."
"That's how I grew up and became an astronaut."
"But I never thought I would be involved in the Apollo program and restart Apollo 18."
Lindgren's face was filled with emotion as he chatted with Watkins before takeoff.
Lindgren was telling the truth. Before becoming an astronaut, he was a doctor of medicine at an American university.
Being a doctor at Amerikan is far more lucrative than being an astronaut, not to mention that there was no guarantee that Lindgren would become an astronaut when he entered the NASA space center.
Watkins was also very emotional: "Yes, the Apollo program, which has been dormant for fifty years, will be restarted in our hands."
The last Apollo spacecraft was Apollo 17. After the successful launch in 1972, no new Apollo spacecraft was born.
NASA has said every time before that it would restart the moon landing program, but it has always remained rhetorical.
No real action.
"It's been more than fifty years since now, and the moon must have changed a lot in fifty years."
"With the latest data coming back from lunar probes and lunar orbiters, we need to reconsider the moon landing site."
"It would be best if we could cooperate with China. We can go to the Chinese lunar space station first, and then make a round trip to the moon from the lunar space station." Lindgren said with a hint of complaint in his tone.
Watkins motioned him to be quiet: "Are you crazy?"
"We have a direct competitive relationship with China. Before, we were able to cooperate with Russia on the International Space Station, but we never cooperated with China."
"The Chinese built the space station alone, let alone the moon landing plan."
"If it was so easy to cooperate, we wouldn't have completed the moon landing plan independently back then."
"You need to be more cautious. NASA's top brass were embarrassed by the Chinese."
"Their lunar space station has occupied NASA's original planned orbit, which was the best orbit around the moon first calculated by NASA."
"It will be beneficial to future trips to the moon. Because NASA has investigated this matter several times internally, they suspect who passed the news to China."
"If your thoughts are exposed, you will definitely be investigated by the higher authorities, and it may even affect the moon landing."
The three of them have been training together for a long time for this moon landing plan.
Including a few years ago, Watkins took the Freedom Dragon spacecraft to the International Space Station for the first time. It was Grindren who led the team.
The two had developed something of a friendship, so Watkins' first reaction after hearing Grindlen's comments was that you have to be careful about what you say and what you do.
Grindlen realized that there was something wrong with his words, and he lowered his voice and said:
"Originally, we should launch a space station around the moon first, and then consider landing on the moon."
"For the Apollo moon landing fifty years ago, a total of ten moon landing sites were selected before launching."
"What about this time? There are only five moon landing sites, which is half less."
"The currently selected lunar landing sites are all located on the near side of the moon at mid- to low-latitudes."
"Many core lunar science objectives cannot be fully achieved due to limitations in the spatial distribution of available landing sites."
"It's a bit of a moonshot for the sake of the moonshot. It feels like a hasty moonshot that was not fully prepared."
"I asked Bob, and the message he gave me was that scientists didn't agree that the moon landing should be so hasty."
"This is completely a hasty plan promoted by NASA officials for certain interests."
There are very few landing sites on the far side of the moon.
Corresponding field work such as on-site dating, in-situ elemental and mineral analysis, and low-frequency radio observations on the far side of the moon cannot be performed well, which will hinder the scientific target research provided by the NRC.
For example, the bombardment history of the inner solar system is uniquely revealed to be unobservable on the Moon,
Because the Moon's largest impact basin (SPA) is located on the far side of the Moon, landing on the near side of the Moon will lack effective in-situ detection.
And the lack of landing sites at high latitudes will result in insufficient support for in situ analysis and return of cryopreserved samples from the lunar polar regions.
This in turn would hinder the research goal: the lunar poles are special environments that bear witness to fluctuating fluxes late in the solar system's history.
From the perspective of higher-level people, Amerikan's moon landing plan is just a preview of future frequent moon landing plans.
It’s Amerikan’s worldwide effort to flex its muscles.
With such high frequency of moon landings and high investment in research and development, Amerikan’s official financial situation is deteriorating day by day.
Americen’s U.S. dollar debt hit a new high.
Through this kind of soft propaganda, coupled with the hot war in some areas, capital was forced to return.
This is America's usual approach.
Landing on the moon is Amerikan's means to cause turmoil and allow capital to flow back.
Grindren cares about scientific research purposes, but Amerikan officials don't care too much.
Because there will be many more moon landings in the future.
Watkins: "I know what you mean."
"This moon landing was really rushed."
"The five selected lunar landing sites are all landing diffuse ellipses located on smooth plains in the equatorial region of the moon."
"The geology of these areas was formed by numerous condensed volcanic flows."
"The area where the landing site is located is one of the youngest volcanic terrains on the moon."
"But as astronauts, even if we know this is a hasty plan, can we give up?"
"No matter how hastily, when the opportunity to go to the moon is placed in front of me, I will choose to go to the moon without hesitation."
"And this time the Apollo 17 spacecraft is 2.5 times larger than the one fifty years ago."
"There are a lot more safety measures. Don't worry too much. It's rare to see you so anxious."
Grindlen sighed: "I'm not worried. To be honest, I'm not afraid of death."
"I'm just afraid that after this moon landing, the next moon landing will have to wait another fifty years."
"I hope this moon landing can achieve enough research goals and answer more unknown puzzles of Blue Star people."
Watkins laughed: "Didn't NASA tell us that there will be many moon landing plans in the future? Isn't this just the beginning?"
Grindlen also laughed and said: "I joined NASA in 2007. When I joined NASA, I heard NASA officials say every year that we will launch the Webb telescope next year."
"Colleagues who came earlier than me have been listening since 2001. As you can see, the Webb telescope was not successfully launched until 2022."
"As for the moon landing, I heard in 2018 that the Orion spacecraft would be used to land on the moon in 2020, and you saw the same result."
"This year is 2024, and we are not going to land on the moon."
"NASA's words are not credible. Many of them are just blowing up the budget to deceive the Congressmen."
"The orbit of the lunar space station is occupied by Chinese people. The cost of repeated moon landings will be several times higher than if there is a lunar space station."
"If this problem is not solved, the cost issue will plague NASA for a long time."
Grindlund has been working at the Johnson Space Center since 2007, and is much older than Watkins at NASA. He is used to seeing NASA officials forget about it as soon as they say it.
He has always had reservations about NASA, and his exaggeration is far greater than reality.
Watkins: "There's not just one suitable space orbit."
"The Gaussian pseudospectral method can be used to calculate several more suitable orbits around the moon based on the baseline trajectory of real-time data by introducing a maximum offset and a fixed time interval."
Watkins also worked for NASA before becoming an astronaut. She previously worked specifically on the Phoenix Mars lander mission.
But there are certain differences between the moon's orbit and the blue star's orbit.
Quasi-periodic orbits in the Earth-Moon system are highly sensitive, and even small errors in position or velocity can have a large impact on the trajectory.
The trajectory is therefore unstable and must be controlled to maintain the corresponding trajectory. The difficulty of orbiting a lunar space station is much greater than that of an earth space station.
It is difficult to find a relatively stable orbit. As for the orbit selection of China's lunar space station, did China refer to NASA's research results?
This is pure coincidence, since the most stable orbit can be calculated.
There is only one solution to a problem. Just because Amerikan calculated this solution does not mean that China cannot calculate it.
Experts in applied mathematics from China considered the contribution of solar gravity and lunar eccentricity to the stabilization strategy of the quasi-periodic orbit based on the perigee point, and used the standard ephemeris to derive the precise position of the quasi-periodic orbit.
NASA originally thought that only they knew this orbit, so they were not in a hurry to occupy the orbit. Sooner or later, it would all be theirs.
But after China's lunar space station was successfully launched, they realized that something was wrong.
The originally planned track was occupied by the Chinese.
