Chapter 87 Avoidance
Style:
Science
Author:
Brilliant orWords: 2072Update Time: 24/01/11 22:43:28
There is never a shortage of food on the island, and the small animals that were ravaged before prove that the ecological chain is not destroyed. Adults can live on this. The so-called starvation is just a lie.
The conclusion of the table is a lie, but the initiator who did not design the plot in this way left it behind. This only proves that the person who did this also knew to some extent that the initiator liked this situation and even joined the plan.
There is never a shortage of food on the island, and the small animals that were ravaged before prove that the ecological chain is not destroyed. Adults can live on this. The so-called starvation is just a lie.
The conclusion of the table is a lie, but the initiator who did not design the plot in this way left it behind. This only proves that the person who did this also knew to some extent that the initiator liked this situation and even joined the plan.
There is never a shortage of food on the island, and the small animals that were ravaged before prove that the ecological chain is not destroyed. Adults can live on this. The so-called starvation is just a lie.
The conclusion of the table is a lie, but the initiator who did not design the plot in this way left it behind. This only proves that the person who did this also understood that the initiator liked this situation very much and even joined the plan.
There is never a shortage of food on the island, and the small animals that were ravaged before prove that the ecological chain is not destroyed. Adults can live on this. The so-called starvation is just a lie.
The conclusion of the table is a lie, but the initiator who did not design the plot in this way left it behind. This only proves that the person who did this also understood that the initiator liked this situation very much and even joined the plan.
There is never a shortage of food on the island, and the small animals that were ravaged before prove that the ecological chain is not destroyed. Adults can live on this. The so-called starvation is just a lie.
The conclusion of the table is a lie, but the initiator who did not design the plot in this way left it behind. This only proves that the person who did this also understood that the initiator liked this situation very much and even joined the plan.
There is never a shortage of food on the island, and the small animals that were ravaged before prove that the ecological chain is not destroyed. Adults can live on this. The so-called starvation is just a lie.
The conclusion of the table is a lie, but the initiator who did not design the plot in this way left it behind. This only proves that the person who did this also understood that the initiator liked this situation very much and even joined the plan.
There is never a shortage of food on the island, and the small animals that were ravaged before prove that the ecological chain is not destroyed. Adults can live on this. The so-called starvation is just a lie.
The conclusion of the table is a lie, but the initiator who did not design the plot in this way left it behind. This only proves that the person who did this also understood that the initiator liked this situation very much and even joined the plan.
There is never a shortage of food on the island, and the small animals that were ravaged before prove that the ecological chain is not destroyed. Adults can live on this. The so-called starvation is just a lie.
The conclusion of the table is a lie, but the initiator who did not design the plot in this way left it behind. This only proves that the person who did this also understood that the initiator liked this situation very much and even joined the plan.
There is never a shortage of food on the island, and the small animals that were ravaged before prove that the ecological chain is not destroyed. Adults can live on this. The so-called starvation is just a lie.
The conclusion of the table is a lie, but the initiator who did not design the plot in this way left it behind. This only proves that the person who did this also understood that the initiator liked this situation very much and even joined the plan.
There is never a shortage of food on the island, and the small animals that were ravaged before prove that the ecological chain is not destroyed. Adults can live on this. The so-called starvation is just a lie.
The conclusion of the table is a lie, but the initiator who did not design the plot in this way left it behind. This only proves that the person who did this also understood that the initiator liked this situation very much and even joined the plan.
There is never a shortage of food on the island, and the small animals that were ravaged before prove that the ecological chain is not destroyed. Adults can live on this. The so-called starvation is just a lie.
The conclusion of the table is a lie, but the initiator who did not design the plot in this way left it behind. This only proves that the person who did this also understood that the initiator liked this situation very much and even joined the plan.
There is never a shortage of food on the island, and the small animals that were ravaged before prove that the ecological chain is not destroyed. Adults can live on this. The so-called starvation is just a lie.
The conclusion of the table is a lie, but the initiator who did not design the plot in this way left it behind. This only proves that the person who did this also understood that the initiator liked this situation very much and even joined the plan.
There is never a shortage of food on the island, and the small animals that were ravaged before prove that the ecological chain is not destroyed. Adults can live on this. The so-called starvation is just a lie.
The conclusion of the table is a lie, but the initiator who did not design the plot in this way left it behind. This only proves that the person who did this also understood that the initiator liked this situation very much and even joined the plan.
There is never a shortage of food on the island, and the small animals that were ravaged before prove that the ecological chain is not destroyed. Adults can live on this. The so-called starvation is just a lie.
The conclusion of the table is a lie, but the initiator who did not design the plot in this way left it behind. This only proves that the person who did this also understood that the initiator liked this situation very much and even joined the plan.
There is never a shortage of food on the island, and the small animals that were ravaged before prove that the ecological chain is not destroyed. Adults can live on this. The so-called starvation is just a lie.
The conclusion of the table is a lie, but the initiator who did not design the plot in this way left it behind. This only proves that the person who did this also understood that the initiator liked this situation very much and even joined the plan.
There is never a shortage of food on the island, and the small animals that were ravaged before prove that the ecological chain is not destroyed. Adults can live on this. The so-called starvation is just a lie.
The conclusion of the table is a lie, but the initiator who did not design the plot in this way left it behind. This only proves that the person who did this also understood that the initiator liked this situation very much and even joined the plan.
There is never a shortage of food on the island, and the small animals that were ravaged before prove that the ecological chain is not destroyed. Adults can live on this. The so-called starvation is just a lie.
The conclusion of the table is a lie, but the initiator who did not design the plot in this way left it behind. This only proves that the person who did this also understood that the initiator liked this situation very much and even joined the plan.
