The first volume has been written. Although I am just a street writer, I still want to make a simple summary like the big guys. It is mainly for my own summary. Readers can skip it.
Too long to watch version:
There will be no more bitterness and hatred in the future!
How come it’s so funny!
How to be happy!
…
formal edition:
For this volume, you have to ask yourself how good your writing is. I can only give myself a 60 points. Considering how hard it is, and I have indeed worked to the limit, I will give myself an additional 10 points, maybe 70 points.
I have written everything I can. If the presentation effect is not good, it is a problem with my level.
The source of inspiration for this book is the Nika fruit in One Piece. I originally wanted to get along with you as a rubber man, but I didn't expect that what I got in exchange was a beating. No more pretending, I am the sun god Nika and I show my cards!
I personally don’t like Oda’s approach. Of course he wants to innovate, but the cheating method is quite cliché, and it directly changes the style and tone of the painting. If any combat power collapses in the future, he can say, No problem, I draw comedy comics!
Of course, how Oda and the Pirate King are doing is not the focus of today. The focus is that from this incident, I suddenly thought that it would be interesting to put the abilities of Tom and Jerry into a serious and cruel world of immortality, right?
Hence this book.
I didn’t think too much when I started the book. I just opened WPS and started working on it. I didn’t expect that the beginning of the book went smoothly, so I insisted on writing it.
Looking back after writing the first volume, I still have a lot of problems.
The first is the plot structure. Readers who have followed the past must have discovered that in addition to daily comedy, I arranged small plots in which the protagonist goes down the mountain to do tasks. These small plots are not very funny, and can even be said to be completely different. Painting style.
It's evil, weird, weird, reversal, and even has a little bit of my own shallow reasoning. Many readers must be dissatisfied. I'm here to see the funny ones. Why do they all have this kind of plot? And it’s very different from the funny style!
Of course I understand that this feeling will occur, but why do I still write it like this?
There are two reasons.
The first one is to echo the theme, which is a sense of contrast.
This world must be full of evil spirits, weird, dark and terrifying, in order to reflect the uniqueness and contrast of the protagonist's prank ability. This is also a very common technique. If you want to show freedom, you must throw the protagonist into the least free environment; if you want to show strength, you must portray a very difficult and difficult environment.
That's what I thought too, but of course I didn't do it well.
I think the portrayal in the first chapter is good. The evil spirit is very scary, but when faced with the protagonist’s funny ability, it is helpless, and it even makes you wonder which one of us is the evil spirit. This is a successful contrast.
But in the subsequent plot, I wrote too many evil spirits and twists, and it was too serious, and it did not reflect the specialness of the protagonist. It deviated a lot from the golden finger and the theme, which made people feel boring and disconnected.
The second one, to be honest, is to write the plot so that there is content in the novel.
Many people will say, what plot is not a plot, why do you have to write this kind of plot? In fact, as long as you have written different types of works, you will know that it is difficult to write funny and nonsensical works. If you just spoof it, readers will soon get tired of it, and it is impossible to write for a long time. Stephen Chow's movie tells a funny story in 90 minutes. Everyone likes it and has become a classic. But if it is made into a nonsensical series of 90 episodes, let alone the difficulty, even if it is shot, it will be very difficult. Hard to look good.
If I only write wild and unconstrained spoofs, the whole novel will seem very exaggerated, completely flying up and down, and I will only think about how I am going to be funny in the next chapter every day. In fact, it is more difficult and painful to write.
But having said all that, what should we do about the plot in the future?
I will try to reduce this sense of fragmentation and treat comedy as the main part. The remaining plots will not be absent, but they will be less. I will try my best to fit the theme of comedy and not write anything so fragmented.
Stay tuned.
Secondly, let’s talk about the issue of personality.
Personality is becoming more and more important even in online articles.
Someone said, isn’t writing novels just about writing about characters?
Yes and no, novels should indeed write about characters, but in fact, for a long time, online novels did not pay special attention to this point. Note that I said no special attention, not no attention at all.
In many works, the protagonist has a very stereotyped image, such as a loser who is bullied and then rises up and gets slapped in the face, soaring all the way to the top. The rhythm of the book is very strong, and the thrill of leveling up is very satisfying, but most of the characters are the same. The protagonist is like this, not to mention the other supporting characters, they are basically tool people. The heroine, the supporting character, the old man, the enemy, cycle back and forth.
So what is my level? It may not be as good as these...
First of all, let’s talk about the character of the protagonist. Many readers will think that the character of the protagonist is too serious and does not deserve such a funny golden finger. I want to say that you are absolutely right, because I deliberately arranged it like this.
Can I make the protagonist more insane? sure. I even wrote like this before. Readers who have read my old books should know that the protagonist I wrote at that time basically broke the fourth wall and complained wantonly. He spoke and acted wildly and did not follow any common sense. Card.
The advantage of this is that every chapter seems to have a laugh, and the tone of the whole book is very nonsensical and hilarious.
But the disadvantage is that it is very exaggerated and flamboyant. When you watch it, if you liven it up, it will soon become boring. Moreover, it is the same sentence and it is not long.
Goldfinger is inherently a spoof, and no matter how insane the protagonist's character is, the whole book can easily turn into a nonsensical hodgepodge.
Therefore, I deliberately wrote the protagonist as a serious person, an ordinary person. Although he occasionally complains, most of the time he is just like us normal people. He may even be more bitter and resentful because of such encounters.
Of course, after the follow-up revenge is over, the protagonist will become much happier, the purpose will change from revenge to happy cultivation, and the atmosphere will be much better.
Secondly, as for the characters of other men and women, I intentionally weakened the protagonist’s character, and instead wanted to focus on portraying the character of the supporting characters. In many works, the person with the most distinctive personality and the most popularity is often not the protagonist, and this is not new.
However, I didn't do this well either.
The first is Master. The character I had in mind was far different from the one shown. What I wanted to write was an image of an innocent person who didn't care about worldly affairs and devoted himself to seeking the truth, but he would never change his determination. She is a bit like a top student in an ivory tower. She has no other aspirations except the Tao she has studied, and she intentionally abandons those messy things. That's why she is so powerful.
But I couldn’t write that feeling, and it wasn’t even likable, so I made a lot of changes, and I came to the conclusion that don’t write female characters easily. If you must write, even if it’s cliché, it should be more likable. Be happy and don't lose readers by portraying extreme personalities.
Great gods can write female characters with distinctive personalities and lovable characters, but I can’t do it now, so I’ll try not to write them.
Basically, I can only describe other people's characters in a one-sided way, highlighting one or two key points.
Sikong Yu is naive, a second grader, and talkative; Bai Huanxi is soft on the outside but strong on the inside, cautious, and knows how to assess the situation; Zeng Yi is honest, poor and just; Han Bufan is cautious and realistic; Jiang Chunyang is arrogant and petty, but in essence Still a good guy and so on.
Again, if the characterization is not good and the writing is not good, it is a problem of the author's level. His writing power is not enough, so he can only learn to improve it little by little.
To sum up, the plot is fragmented and the characters are poorly developed.
My future goal is to write funny daily stories and not force myself to touch things that are beyond my level.
Reality is fucked up enough. If you can make everyone happy, it is already a great merit. Why do you want to think so much...
Am I right?
