Response to Chapters 143 to 145 High Frequency Spray Points

Point 1: Why didn’t the male protagonist just kill Meister?

Reason 1: After the male protagonist deconstructed Most's memory, he found that he had done no evil and did not meet the criteria for killing.

Reason 2: There is Hotams College behind Meister. This is the equivalent of Hogwarts in the Harry Potter series.

Reason 3: The male protagonist finds that Meuster is valuable, that is, he can be fooled by him.

The above three reasons are clearly written in the text. Readers who know how to complain should have a "quantum reading" phenomenon.

I know, everyone likes to watch plots where people are killed instantly without saying a word.

To be honest, I also like writing this kind of plot.

But I am an author who has experienced the "Network Cleanup Operation". I know how many so-called "decisive and decisive" people were killed during the operation. So when writing, I will make sure that no "good guy" is accidentally killed by the male protagonist.

I can promise here that all the "bad guys" in this book will be killed, and the male protagonist will not be merciful. At the same time, "good guys" will not be accidentally killed.

...

Point 2: Did the hero and Meister talk too much? And the male protagonist behaves differently than before?

Reason 1: The male protagonist was deconstructing Moster and making up the words on the spot based on the results of the deconstruction. This is "speaking people's words when meeting people".

Reason 2: The heroic words uttered by the male protagonist are obviously trying to make himself fit the "father" image in Kim Most's impression.

There are nearly 7,000 words of deconstruction and psychological activities of the male protagonist in organizing his thoughts, but I did not include them in the main text. Because after repeated consideration, I feel that putting these 7,000 words after the main text will make the rhythm of the main text very slow, and book friends will complain about the low number of words.

I thought readers could understand why the hero did what he did, but it turned out I was wrong. In the future, I will be more "white" and stuff all the things that the male protagonist thought of and deconstructed into the text. It is better to be sprayed with "hydrology" than to be misunderstood.

...

Point 3: Did the male protagonist’s stance change too quickly?

Maybe it’s because I update too diligently, so everyone feels it’s too fast.

In fact, since the male protagonist entered the Golden Federation, he has published nearly 400,000 words. Moreover, the number of words used to explain the change in stance reached nearly 30,000 words.

Everyone reads it too smoothly and coherently, so it feels like it changes too quickly.

If I divide these 30,000 words into one chapter of 2,000 words and send them out in 6 to 7 days, it may not feel as fast.

In addition, the male protagonist’s change of position meets the following conditions:

Condition 1: The male protagonist insists on not hurting good people.

Condition 2: The male protagonist discovers that judging evil people privately will lead to pursuit by good people.

Condition 3: When the male protagonist finds that he is being chased by a good guy, he has no other option but to escape.

Based on the above three conditions, the male protagonist decided not to judge evildoers privately in the future.

...

Point 4: Damn it, the male protagonist can no longer judge evildoers privately, why am I still looking at your sister?

In the subsequent updates from the 14th to the 15th day, the male protagonist can judge the evildoers in a fair and just manner.

...

Point 5: The male protagonist of the neutral and good camp is not likable.

Response:

Chaotic kindness means: I don’t care whether these game rules are reasonable or not. I deny all these game rules and establish new game rules based on my own understanding of kindness.

Lawful good means: I unconditionally acknowledge and obey the existing rules of the game, and practice my good deeds.

Neutral kindness means: I think the existing game rules are good and close to my understanding of "kindness". I can continue to abide by the existing game rules. On the other hand, if I feel that the existing game rules do not conform to my understanding of "kindness", I will deny the existing game rules and establish new existing rules.

Neutral Good has a very flexible moral bottom line. It is not the Holy Mother. The Holy Mother is a product of the Lawful Good alignment.

If you carefully compare the unblocked wizarding novels, it is not difficult to find that the male protagonists of all legal wizarding novels are basically neutral and good.

...

Point 6: Didn’t the male protagonist say that he must abide by the rules? Then go to Tatis and accept the trial.

The male protagonist is neutral and kind, not a fool. He believes Tatis' order is unreasonable and will not stand trial by Tatis.

...

Point 7: Why not destroy Tatis?

Every injustice has its owner, and every debt has its owner. Wrongful killing of innocent people = entire book removed from shelves.