Everyone must come in and take a look!

Hello everyone, I am the author. Now I would like to introduce the title and content of this article to you. The full text is only about a thousand words. Please take two or three minutes to read it. Thank you!

The reason for writing this explanation is that recently a reader personally pointed out that the content of the article has nothing to do with the imperial examination and court, but is biased towards daily house fighting. In this regard, the author thought about it and thought that there may be many readers who have not yet said so. , just think of this and give a unified reply:

1. First, about the content arrangement of this article:

The full text of this article = 1/6 [Growth process + school reading] + 2/6 [Children's examination + rural examination + general examination + palace examination + Imperial Academy conferment] + 3/6 [from grassroots officials to chief ministers of the court, during which time there are also On a mission to a foreign country]

Seeing this, some readers may want to ask: Author, why don’t you just start writing from the exam? Why do we need to write the first 1/6 of the content?

Don't mention it, the author has an outline that is just like this. But the problem with this writing is that the heroine of this article took the imperial examination as a woman. The difference between this and women disguising themselves as men and men taking the lead in the imperial examination lies in how there can be a self-consistent logic to rationalize the emergence of the women's imperial examination system.

In ancient times, it was basically impossible to compete with men for interests without special circumstances. Of course, novels, especially fictional novels, are exaggerated. If they were more realistic, no one would read them. It's just that the author wants to make the exaggeration seem less exaggerated. Even if the author starts writing directly from the exam, he still needs to cover these contents.

However, due to the limited writing power of the author, the previous version of the outline would be biased as written, so the first 1/6 of the foreshadowing was added.

In particular, the process of the women's imperial examination is definitely not smooth sailing. There are also twists and turns and struggles. It would be too tedious to write down the examination process with an explanation of the previous situation, so the explanation of the previous situation that needs to be paused later has been slightly adjusted to the first 1/6.

2. The necessity of the first 1/6 of the content is that the author wants to let everyone feel the customs and customs of the time and space where the novel is set through the foreshadowing and description. This can be written directly later without going into details, and everyone will not know how. It feels strange.

More importantly, the author will have some other settings for the heroine's early stage of studying. If she writes it directly without any preliminary preparation, the author may not be capable enough and the readers will think "I can't understand what you wrote." What is this?" confusion.

So I just wrote about the heroine’s growth as a child and her school days before the child exam.

To sum up, in the author's opinion, the first 1/6 is really not dispensable. The author clumsily but hard tries to show how the women's imperial examination is step by step through the changes in the outside world and the waves between the court and the back house. Realization, and the growth and changes of the heroine in this process also paved the way for the way of thinking and behavior in the subsequent imperial examinations and entering the court.

Of course, it may be that the author is not strong enough to write clearly enough.

But it doesn’t matter, the author will work hard! (make a fist)

3. Finally, thank you readers for your comments. Regardless of whether you can continue reading, the author thanks you for your company, appearance and comments.

After all, because of your opinions, I can better pay attention to whether my article is deviant, and I can better complete the article's shortcomings.

Finally, I would like to thank you all again for taking the time to read the author Jun Dudu, thank you!